Chen Mingtong put forward the theory of customizing the public version, which once again set off a thousand piles of snow in the field of papers and a big frying pan on the Internet. (Photo Source/Photo from Letter Media Information)
After the former Hsinchu City Lin Zhijian withdrew his appeal from National Taiwan University, Chen Mingtong, the advisor and former director of the National Security Bureau, issued a statement emphasizing that Yu Zhenghuang’s thesis he provided was a “customized public version”, triggering Internet speculation; I have never heard of the so-called “public version theory”, and related associations are not fair to other students.
Chen Mingtong issued a statement late last night insisting that Lin Zhijian did not plagiarize Yu Zhenghuang’s thesis, and that none of the progress of the thesis as evidenced by Yu Zhenghuang on January 5, 2016 came from his own handwriting.
Chen Mingtong said that the rest of the content was for him to help him change the topic of the thesis, so that he could complete the thesis oral examination within six months of the graduation deadline.
Chen Mingtong emphasized that in fact Yu Zhenghuang referred to Lin Zhijian’s creative achievements, but Lin Zhijian did not plagiarize Yu Zhenghuang’s thesis.
(More news: From Europe’s “Taiwan card” to see Cai Mingyan’s acceptance of National Security Director Ukraine’s reconstruction interests may intensify the cross-strait situation)
The statement made PTT and netizens stir up trouble, politicians who graduated from the National Development Institute: I have never heard of the public version
Lin Zhijian’s thesis caused serious damage to the green camp election. Can the withdrawal of the petition really stop the bleeding? (Photo source/taken from Lin Zhijian’s Facebook page)
As soon as Chen Mingtong’s statement came out, PTT netizens immediately stirred up speculation, and even questioned whether the 173 masters and doctors under Chen’s guidance also had a “public version”?
A politician who is also a former student of Chen’s mentor emphasized that he has never heard of any “public version” or “copy canned food”, including the title of the thesis, research methods and interviewees, all of which are his own hard work proposed.
He emphasized that the problem with the Lin Zhijian incident is not the thesis, but the attitude of not admitting mistakes. The damage was done during the election at the end of last year, and the wounds left are still unable to heal.
“The appeal has been withdrawn, and the crux of the matter still lies with Lin Zhijian.” The politician pointed out that although A Tongshi’s statement caused controversy, it should no longer be the focus of public attention.
Lawyer Yu Zhenghuang made a three-point statement, intending to file a lawsuit against Chen Mingtong
Yu Zhenghuang has issued a 3-point statement through 3 lawyers. (Photo source/taken from Wu Junda Facebook)
The follow-up political effect remains to be seen, but Yu Zhenghuang, who was accused by Master Atong, has issued a 3-point statement through 3 lawyers.
The first point is that Lin’s withdrawal of the petition has shown that National Taiwan University is correct in its determination of plagiarism.
Secondly, Yu Zhenghuang will continue to complete the follow-up legal procedures for Lin Zhijian’s self-prosecution of copyright and aggravated defamation.
Third, it claimed that Professor Chen Mingtong “repeatedly turned the truth upside down” and slandered him in the form of a lawyer’s statement. After detailed discussion, he will seek a legal solution.
Lawyer Zhang Youqi responded that the legal team will also discuss with Yu Zhenghuang and is considering suing Chen Mingtong. He also posted on Facebook that a National Taiwan University professor himself said that he provided the public version for students to plagiarize (although it was not true in this case).
There is a Bodhisattva behind the official Mindai, Lai: Stop the loss of political damage
Regarding the “public version”, one of the lawyers repeatedly expressed surprise. There is no such thing, and he has never heard of it. The appeal is in the final stage. If it wasn’t for the result, it should be unfavorable. Why did Lin Zhijian withdraw it?
The lawyer believes that Lin Zhijian’s decision to withdraw his appeal should be related to the resolution of the Central Executive Committee of the DPP to customize the academic ethics mechanism; as for Chen Mingtong’s mention of “customized public version”, it will make the outside world question whether his other students have similar situations ?
A National Taiwan University professor emphasized that the focus of the thesis is innovation and value. Chen Mingtong’s statement is equivalent to the actual supervisor, and Yu Zhenghuang’s original supervisor Li Bihan should also explain.
The professor revealed that the National Taiwan University National Development Institute (on-the-job special class) and many classes are required by the government. Every official and Mindai who come to study “has a Bodhisattva behind him.” Over time, a crisis of national governance has formed. It is necessary to take this opportunity to conduct a thorough review.
Master Atong’s big move seems to have caused the DPP to continue to lose blood. People in the financial industry said that at that age, what they care about is not fame or profit, but their displeasure; You can scold him, or simply destroy him.
Regarding the aftermath of the statement, people from the Lai family said helplessly that Master Atong is no longer a public official, and he is not a public figure, so he should not cause more political harm to the green camp.
Under the leadership of Vice President and Party Chairman Lai Ching-teh, the Democratic Progressive Party hopes to clear up the field of papers as soon as possible, but A Tongshi’s statement continues to stir up even greater controversies.
More media reports
When will Guo Taiming return? The Standing Committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China stops to watch and listen to Zhu Lilun who supports the Guo faction: implement the “non-green alliance” as soon as possible
TSMC plummets 3.66%”ChatGPT’s current red capital raises the target price of TSMC’s two major customers AMD and Huida
“Big Mike Family” returns for a limited time on 2/15 classic reappearance 15 floors “Invincible Big Mike” challenges the limit of mouth opening!
More related news
Hearing Chen Mingtong’s “this sentence”, Yu Zhenghuang considered suing: It is very shameful to Lin Zhijian!
The National Institute of Development Research paper is the public version. Lan Ying picked up the gun and blasted it wildly, and the netizens were sour
Lin Zhijian Withdrew His Petition for a Degree at National Taiwan University and Apologized to the Society for Disturbances in Academic Relations
Lin Zhijian apologized for the paper and Zheng Yunpeng was reluctant: I still believe him
Chen Mingtong wants to destroy the National Development Institute of National Taiwan University?Zhao Shaokang criticizes: the shame of academia
