On the second day of the hearing for the validity of same-sex marriage in the Indian Supreme Court, advocates stressed the need to “push society to acknowledge us as equals in all respects because the Constitution says so”. Advocates argued that marriage equality would help to remove “the next brick of exclusion” for the LGBT+ community and reduce the stigma surrounding them. Senior advocates also argued that the core value of equality is threatened not only by the state, but also by non-state actors. The hearing comes after the decriminalisation of homosexuality in 2018, in a landmark case known as Navtej Johar v. the Union of India. Meanwhile, the Centre has sought views of states on the issue, stating that an assessment of state rules and customs of different sections of society is required.
Lawyers argue for marriage equality in India, citing the need for society to acknowledge LGBTQ+ people as equals under the Constitution. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi argues for benefits of marriage to be extended to same-sex couples, while senior advocate AM Singhvi stresses the removal of exclusion and reducing stigma around the community. The Centre seeks views of states on marriage equality amid Supreme Court hearing. Taiwan becomes the first Asian nation to legalise same-sex marriage.
Krefeld Ravens Football Team Aiming for Promotion [WZ+]
Heilongjiang's Winter Fishing Season: Largest Single-Net Catch Produces 300,000 Jin of Fish
This is an equation for elementary school students that many adults cannot solve. What's the correc...
Emigration Success Stories: Overcoming Challenges and Finding Support with Cáritas