The lawyer Fernando Amaya, He told how the events that today have him on the verge of a 9-year sentence occurred: “2 years ago, I was at my house in the afternoon, I was resting, I heard some noises on the first floor, when the noises were repeated, I remember my dad’s gun with the expectation and I find that there is a man who is hitting the window with a brick, and the moment the window is broken I fire a warning shot, then I call the police ”
But as Amaya himself puts it, the fact becomes almost absurd, because the process turned against him: “When the police arrive, they repair that the revolver is in my dad’s name and not in my name, I am involved in the crime of possession and illegal carriage and that’s what I say, an irregularity of an administrative nature, my dad’s revolver without having a transfer, that could be solved by doing a procedure in INDUMIL, but happened to be accused of a crime as a bad criminal “
“I have been with this situation for 2 years, my lawyers asked for the estoppel, even the prosecution requested the estoppel, but unfortunately the Prosecutor’s Office and the judge deny it, the Prosecutor’s Office does not appeal and I am faced with a legal technicality that even when my lawyers appeal, The second instance judge states that because the Prosecutor’s Office had not appealed the appeal is not admissible and confirms the decision, and I lose the possibility of getting out of the legal problem clean” Expressed the lawyer Fernando Amaya.
In this interview, the lawyer tells what happened to the young man who tried to enter to your residence: “I take a first shot and fortunately the boy receives a wound superficial, But the problem is not that, it is clear to the Prosecutor’s Office than the mild personal injuries the boy received, they exempt me because it is clear that I was in privileged legitimate defense, which is the one that any citizen you can do when you are defending your life and property, that topic is not the one that has me in this situation, this sounds unfair because of the absurdity “
– .
