Great annoyance caused in Lautaro de Buin the resolution of the Second Chamber of the Autonomous Disciplinary Court of the ANFP, which preventedly suspended the participation of the team on the First B, until the processing of the ANFP’s own complaint to clarify the contractual relations of the club the players Hans Martinez Y Jose Barrera.
This decision revoked a above of April 9, First Chamber of the same Court, which allowed the club to start performing in the tournament First B.
The lawyer of the sports institution of the Province of Maipo, Alejandro Preuss, pointed to Sports DNA that “obviously the club does not agree with this resolution, which we consider is arbitrary and illegal, since in the same case that is being heard, both in the First Room as in the Second Room We allege the incompetence of the Disciplinary Tribunal“.
–
The professional added that “to contextualize, it must be said that what you want to investigate is a rule that describes criminal conduct. And that Court (sports court of the ANFP) does not have jurisdiction over criminal regulations. They have denied us the request for impeachment, and an appeal was illegally granted to the ANFP, in which there were no allegations ”.
Alexander Preuss He explained that “the regulatory and constitutional standards for the guarantees of rights were not complied with, and unfortunately this Second Chamber adjusted a resolution that anticipates a possible sanction, which is unfair, illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Furthermore, Lautaro de Buin has not even been able to answer the ANFP’s complaint ”.
–
For the lawyer of the Santiago club that jumped as champion of the Second Division to First B, “The sanction imposed is contrary to all ANFP regulations and our legal system, since an alleged falsification or adulteration of documents is adduced, which should be seen by a Court of Guarantees or an Oral Criminal Court. And if there is a conviction in this way, only then can a Court like the ANFP come to hear a sports sanction ”.
Since Lautaro de Buin reported that they are studying the actions that they will follow in favor of what they define as the right and constitutional guarantees that correspond to any organization or citizen.
– .