class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>
Sport In the 28th week of Toto Super League Fenerbahce with Trabzonspor in the 18th minute of the match İrfan Can KahveciThe red card he saw was talked about a lot. Following the recommendation of VAR referee Mete Kalkavan, showing a red card to İrfan Can Zorbay LittleWhile this decision of ‘s was on the agenda in the social media, Fenerbahçe also published a statement at halftime.
İRFAN CAN AND İSMAİL KARTAL ARE VERY ANGRY
After Zorbay Küçük showed his red card, Fenerbahçe football players and coach İsmail Kartal, especially İrfan Can, intensely objected to Zorbay Küçük.
FOREIGN ITEMS FROM THE TRIBUNE
Fenerbahce people in the stands reacted to the red card decision as well as in the field. After Zorbay Küçük’s decision, foreign materials were thrown from the stands to the field. Bakasetas, who came to the corner post to take a corner, suffered a short-term injury after a substance hit him.
class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>
THE GOAL COMES AFTER 4 MINUTES
Fenerbahce, who remained 10 people in the 18th minute against the league leader Trabzonspor, saw the goal 4 minutes later.
Nwakaeme, who hit the ball diagonally, took his team forward when Abdulkadir Ömür, who went down to the line from the left in the fast developing Trabzonspor attack, took the ball from the ground towards the penalty spot.
ANNOUNCEMENT FROM FENERBAHÇE
Fenerbahce, infrequently, shared a statement about referee Zorbay Küçük on their official Twitter account during the halftime of the match.
Fenerbahçe’s statement is as follows:
We expressed our concern about the referee appointed at midnight! All of Turkey saw that we were right in the 17th minute! The person who forgets that he is a member of the TFF Board of Directors and assists in the appointment of referees will sooner or later be held accountable.
SOCIAL MEDIA DIVIDED
While the red card seen by İrfan Can Kahveci was one of the most talked about topics on social media, football fans were divided into two.
While some fans argued that the position was not a red card, some fans stated that the referee’s decision was correct.
POSITION WAS EVALUATED AT ‘TRIO’
The position in which İrfan Can Kahveci received a red card was evaluated by Lale Orta, Deniz Çoban and Bülent Yıldırım in the broadcaster organization beIN SPORTS’ program called ‘Trio’.
class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>
Here are the comments of former referees:
LALE ORTA: THERE IS THIS POSITION IN THE TRAINING PACKAGES OF UEFA
The decision made in the position has a big impact on the match. I think the red card is wrong. No deliberate and cruel pressing. The ball is in the middle, Siopis slides in, İrfan Can also wants to play with the ball. The ground slipping foot has a pressing position. UEFA’s training packages have this one-to-one position. UEFA’s recommendation in these positions is a yellow card. A red card should never be given. I also find the intervention of VAR wrong. It only seems like a very hard press from one angle and in slow motion, but such positions should be studied as a whole. The yellow card for the most uncontrolled moves.
class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>
BÜLENT YILDIRIM: NO malicious intent, no violence
Let me tell you from the beginning, this decision is wrong. Both players have a chance to play the ball. While the opponent slides towards him, he tries to get the ball with the outside of his left foot, which he dominates, while Siopis tries to get the ball by blocking it. Both players completely focused on the ball. Games with serious fouls must have bad faith. There is no malice here, they are both fully focused on the ball. Both have a chance to play the ball. Let’s see how the unfortunate contact happens. Siopis slides in, İrfan Can trying to save the ball with the outside of his foot as he continues to slide, unfortunately steps on the opponent’s foot because his right foot is on the ground. No bad intention. The ball jammed, bounced, and contact was made. You can see that İrfan Can bounces back to reduce the intensity. The red card is wrong here. Only if and only if an uncontrolled move is a yellow card. VAR’s intervention is also wrong. It is not a position that can be seen in black and white. This interference caused both the referee and the match to be in trouble.
class=”medyanet-inline-adv”>
SEA SHEEPHERD: MAXIMUM IS A YELLOW CARD
Cruelty, hurt and cruelty are essential for a red card. A move made with the screws of the cleats can be seen as a level of brutality, but… We can’t call it a brutal push in this position. Sometimes your unintentional move can also bring red. Here, we are looking at intent, as we are unsure of the hurtful nature of the event. It is clear that he has no bad intentions. The intention is good, but the power transfer does not occur as a result of pressing. He immediately turns around and tries to get his foot. And your heel is not on the ground. If the heel is on the ground, the power transfer is not completely realized. If it presses on the ankle in a standing struggle, this contact point is important, but here the player has slipped. Considering all these factors, this position will be the maximum yellow card. Some people might say it’s red. But that’s fine for you, for me, and VAR can’t interfere. VAR’s intervention is wrong in this position.
–
