n### Agung sedayu Group Clarifies Ownership of mysterious Sea Fence in Tangerang
The Agung Sedayu Group has finally addressed the controversy surrounding the mysterious sea fence stretching 30.16 kilometers along the Tangerang coast. The group confirmed that its subsidiaries, PT Intan Agung Makmur (IAM) and PT Cahaya inti Sentosa (CIS), hold Building Use Rights (HGB) certificates for a portion of the fenced area. However, the group’s attorney, Muannas Alaidid, clarified that the HGB does not cover the entire fence.”The length of the fence passes through six sub-districts, but that does not mean that all of them have HGB. The HGB of PANI’s subsidiaries, namely PT IAM and PT CIS, is only in Kohod Village,” Muannas emphasized. This statement aims to dispel the growing assumption that the entire fence is owned by the Agung Sedayu Group.
Muannas also shed light on the history of the fence, stating that it predates the construction of the PIK 2 project. “During that visit, the sea fences were there even before PIK 2 was built, even before Pak Jokowi served as president,” he added, referencing a 2014 visit by former Tangerang Regent Zaki Iskandar.
The controversy deepened when the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Nusron wahid, announced plans to revoke the HGB for the fence. Muannas responded cautiously,stating,”We are still checking the reasons for the revocation. Until now,we have not received any official documents or written letters.” He emphasized that the group would thoroughly examine the legal basis for the cancellation before issuing a formal response.
Key Points at a Glance
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Fence Length | 30.16 kilometers |
| HGB Coverage | Only in Kohod Village, Pakuhaji District, Tangerang |
| Subsidiaries Involved | PT Intan Agung Makmur (IAM) and PT Cahaya inti Sentosa (CIS) |
| Past Context | Fence existed before PIK 2 project and Joko Widodo’s presidency |
| Current issue | ATR/BPN plans to revoke HGB; Agung Sedayu Group awaiting official documents|
The Agung Sedayu Group’s clarification comes amid mounting public scrutiny and speculation about the fence’s purpose and ownership. As the situation unfolds, stakeholders await further developments regarding the HGB revocation and its implications for the controversial structure.A mysterious sea fence has sparked controversy in Tangerang, raising questions about land ownership and certification processes. According to Muannas,a representative involved in the matter,the area in question holds a Certificate of Ownership Rights (SHM) and has undergone proper procedures. “Moreover, this HGB has gone through the correct processes and procedures. We bought it from the community who own the Certificate of Ownership Rights (SHM) and have paid taxes and obtained an official location Permit and PKKPRL (Approval of Conformity for Marine Spatial Utilization Activities),” he explained.
However, the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning, Nusron Wahid, has raised concerns about the legitimacy of the Building Use Rights (HGB) certificates. He revealed that the fenced-off area is HGB certified, with a total of 263 plots registered under various entities. These include PT Intan Agung Makmur with 234 fields, PT Cahaya Inti Sentosa with 20 fields, and individuals holding 9 fields.
Despite the certification, Nusron plans to revoke the HGB due to procedural flaws. “The reason is, the certificate is procedurally flawed,” he stated. this decision has added fuel to the ongoing debate about land use and ownership in the region.
to better understand the situation, here’s a summary of the key details:
| Entity | Number of Fields |
|—————————|———————-|
| PT Intan Agung makmur | 234 |
| PT Cahaya Inti Sentosa | 20 |
| Individuals | 9 |
The controversy highlights the complexities of land certification and the importance of adhering to proper procedures. As the situation unfolds, stakeholders await further developments and clarity on the future of the fenced-off area.
For more insights into land ownership and certification processes, explore the role of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning in regulating such matters.
