Kremlin Stands Firm on Black Sea Grain Export Agreement

Kremlin Stands Firm on Grain Export Agreement, Citing Lack of Implementation

The Kremlin has reiterated its position that there are “no reasons” to extend the agreement for exporting grain through the ports of the Black Sea. The agreement, which was mediated by Turkey and the United Nations, has not been properly implemented, according to the Kremlin.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that the United Nations must admit that they have not succeeded in exerting the necessary influence on the countries of the West to fulfill the provisions for Russia in the agreement. Peskov was referring to Russia’s list of demands, which includes the removal of obstacles to the export of Russian grain and fertilizer shipments.

Russian President Vladimir Putin had previously mentioned that Russia was considering withdrawing from the grain deal, which also allows for the export of ammonia. However, no such withdrawal has occurred.

In response, a United Nations spokesman announced that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called for the acceleration of grain shipments from Ukrainian ports on the Black Sea under the grain deal. Russia has threatened to withdraw from the pact next month.

The Black Sea Grains Initiative, brokered by the United Nations and Turkey with Russia and Ukraine in July 2022, aimed to address the global food crisis exacerbated by the war and the blockade of Ukraine’s Black Sea ports.

Previously, Russia used to export up to 2.5 million tons of ammonia annually through the port of Pivdenye. However, the pipeline was closed due to the war, and Moscow has accused Ukrainian forces of blowing up part of the pipeline.

One of Russia’s demands in talks to extend the grain deal is the restarting of the ammonia pipeline. As a result, Moscow began stopping ships heading to the port of Bevdenye under the agreement until the pipeline is restarted.

To persuade Russia to agree to the initiative, a three-year deal was struck in July 2022, in which the United Nations agreed to help Moscow overcome any obstacles to its food and fertilizer shipments.

The situation remains tense as the deadline for the extension of the grain agreement approaches. The international community is closely watching the developments, hoping for a resolution that will ensure the smooth export of grain and alleviate the global food crisis.

#Russia #escalating #grain #agreement #reasons #extend

black sea grain initiative

Their obligations under the grain export agreement. Peskov emphasized that it is the responsibility of all parties involved to ensure the proper implementation of the agreement, and the failure to do so cannot be attributed solely to Russia.

The Kremlin’s firm stance on the lack of implementation of the grain export agreement comes in response to concerns raised by various stakeholders. Despite the agreement being signed between Russia and Ukraine, the Kremlin has criticized the United Nations and Turkey for not effectively ensuring that the deal is being upheld. This indicates the Kremlin’s frustration with the perceived lack of commitment from other involved parties.

The grain export agreement was intended to allow for the resumption of vital grain exports from Ukrainian Black Sea ports. However, the Kremlin argues that without proper implementation, the agreement becomes meaningless. It remains to be seen how the impasse over the implementation will be resolved, and whether further negotiations or action will be taken in order to address the Kremlin’s concerns.

In conclusion, the Kremlin stands firm on the lack of implementation of the grain export agreement, citing the failure of the United Nations and Turkey to effectively ensure its fulfillment. This position reflects the Kremlin’s insistence on the importance of all parties fulfilling their obligations under the agreement for it to have any practical significance.