Kevin Magnussen is an “F4 stage racing mind” and former F1 champion Villeneuve[F1-Gate.com]

Former F1 world champion Jacques Villeneuve believes Haas F1 staff’s Kevin Magnussen ought to be penalized and suspended for one race for inflicting Sergio Perez’s huge crash on the Monaco Grand Prix. Perez and Magnussen clashed on the opening lap of the Monaco Grand Prix as they raced up the hill in direction of Beau Rivage.

Magnussen discovered a niche to Perez’s proper and went in, however as anticipated the spot went down and call and a sequence response ensued, with the Crimson Bull driver hitting the barrier exhausting and inflicting an accident Magnussen staff Nico Hulkenberg I jumped into the observe. After the crash, all three automobiles retired on the spot, and Perez’s RB20 was fully destroyed. Stewards selected to not examine the crash additional, however Villeneuve is sad that Magnussen acquired a lighter penalty. Magnussen could be very near being banned for one race, as he would turn into the primary driver in F1 historical past to obtain an computerized ban if he receives two penalty factors on high of his tremendous license. – this season. “What was Magnussen considering? He is been within the racing world for a very long time,” Villeneuve advised Greatest On-line Poker Websites. “The motive force in entrance, on this case Sergio Perez, doesn’t look in his mirror. He takes a fast look to make it possible for the opponent just isn’t subsequent to him, and if he comes near him, he takes the his personal line. “If you’re within the automotive behind you, you’ve got to have the ability to perceive the state of affairs and predict what is going on to occur. “He ought to have given me house.”We’re all the time taught to be chargeable for the driving force behind us.”If you wish to drive, you have to drive aspect by aspect, with out placing the entrance wing near us. rear wheel.”What does this imply? In fact, Magnussen acquired out of the automotive and stated, “Oops, I am sorry, completely.” In actual fact, he says, “It ought to be the opposite approach round.” “What sort of planet will we stay on?” I am impressed. The system is not truthful. And it ended the continued debate about driver penalties and stewards’ choices. Some say the present system is not. deal appropriately with harmful driving behaviour, whereas others say a extra delicate method is required, taking into consideration the drivers’ circumstances and intentions.The Magnussen incident in Monaco is a place to begin on this debate Villeneuve’s sturdy stance places stress on the FIA ​​to carry drivers to excessive requirements. Villeneuve referred to as for revised wheel-to-wheel racing tips. “The way in which the foundations are written can also be an issue.” stated Villeneuve. “Poorly written” “It says the driving force in entrance should give approach, however it ought to write that the driving force in entrance just isn’t allowed to pressure anybody out of the truck. It is not the identical factor. “Giving a spot is like driving whereas wanting in your mirror and successfully saying, “Come over, I will offer you a spot.” for you.” That’s not what it’s presupposed to imply.” Alternatively, if the foundations If it says, “It’s forbidden to pressure somebody off the trail,” it implies that it’s forbidden for an additional driver to intentionally not look within the mirror.” ”It is a fantastic line. This rule locations duty on the automotive in entrance of you.” That is it. he says, however it’s loopy.