Home » World » Kazakhstan strangles Russia: Who controls Tokaev? –

Kazakhstan strangles Russia: Who controls Tokaev? –

/ world today news/ Western sources report that from April 1, the Kazakh authorities will begin blocking parallel imports into Russia. Officials of this country also openly state that they are not cutting off economic ties with their northern neighbor, but they will not allow circumvention of the sanctions imposed against it. For now, Astana is comfortable sitting on two chairs, but Western friends strongly advise her to choose one of them.

The anti-Russian gestures of the “ally”

At the beginning of the year, senior envoys of the new world order visited Astana. A day before the visit of US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, the devoted Kazakh friends closed their trade mission in Moscow. Promising that this in no way will “affect the development of bilateral trade and economic cooperation as a whole”.

If it really won’t make an impact, then one wonders: why did they shut it down? But only naive fools can believe the elegant formulations of Eastern diplomats. So the aforementioned Blinken does not take words on faith, but requires real deeds.

Back in September of last year, at a meeting with the foreign ministers of the countries of Central Asia, he told them like guilty students that they must strictly observe the anti-Russian sanctions. We are talking about countries which, imagine for a moment, which are members of at least EAEU or CSTO. Then, as if on cue, they hastened to cut ties with the sanctioned Russian banks.

Subsequently, however, the American “leadership” softened somewhat, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US Treasury Department (OFAC) kindly allowed the same Kazakhstan to carry out transactions with bank cards of the MIR system. But only under his “special control’. This, note, is allowed to a sovereign state.

What Blinken and Kasim-Jomart Tokaev talked about on the last day of February is known only to them. But in general, it is easy to guess. During the press conference that followed the meeting, the host expressed his gratitude to the distinguished guest “for the United States’ continued and steadfast support of our independence, territorial integrity, and sovereignty”. It is as if someone is reaching for all this (although, knowing in what colors Russia and China are painted in the West, it is quite clear who the Kazakh leader was mocking here). But the American in his speech clearly developed the “party line” – that’s what he actually came for:

This is not just Russian aggression against Ukraine, and all the terrible things that Russia is doing in Ukraine are aggression against the basic principles of the UN Charter, which we believe are aimed at maintaining peace and stability, including in your region. Therefore, it is important for all countries to unite and oppose Russian aggression. Not only in the name of protecting Ukraine, but also in the name of these principles. If they are violated, then Russia will be able to direct aggression against other countries.

And warned that China will face serious problems not only in relations with the US, but also with other countries if Beijing supports Russia in the Ukrainian conflict.”

The US secretary of state then rushed to Tashkent to press Tokaev’s Uzbek counterpart Shavkat Mirziyoyev. And just a few days after the appearance of the prominent envoy, the exemplary leaders of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan immediately held a meeting in Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

Well, serious Eastern men suddenly wanted to discuss, according to the press, “the prospects for increasing mutual trade, attracting investments, developing cooperation in the industrial, energy, agricultural, transport and logistics sectors”, as well as to exchange “opinions on topical issues of the regional agenda”.

In addition, British Foreign Secretary James Cleverley visited Kazakhstan. He talks about “reducing the negative economic impact of the conflict over Ukraine on Kazakhstan”, for “looking for alternative ways (bypassing Russia, of course) to export Kazakh products, be it oil, gas or anything else.”

Finally, First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan Kairat Umarov met with NATO Assistant Secretary General for Political and Security Affairs and Special Representative for Central Asia and the Caucasus Javier Kolomina.

During the conversation, Umarov assured the NATO chief of Astana’s commitment to strengthening relations with the alliance. At the same time, he clearly indicated that it does not support Moscow on the Ukrainian issue, defending the principle of territorial integrity and the provisions of the UN Charter, and does not allow Russia to circumvent Western sanctions with the help of Kazakhstan.

Well, he also assured that his country regularly helps the regime in Kiev with supplies of petroleum products, transformers, medicines and power generators. That is, it reports on the implementation of the set agenda one hundred percent.

Once they ordered you to perform, then you perform

I would like to draw attention to Umarov’s statement about the sanctions, that is, about the so-called parallel import. In our country, it is not accepted to talk about this publicly, because in words, publicly, a very successful total import substitution is going on in Russia.

But in the West they write (in particular, the Reuters agency) that after the refusal of another of our dear and reliable partners, to whom we build nuclear power plants for free – Turkey – from the transit of sanctioned goods to Russia, the Russian companies are literally asking Kazakhstan for parallel imports.

Our people reportedly want everything from aircraft spare parts to rare earth metals from Australia. And one can treat such information as an information “leak”, but the truth, as they say, is somewhere in the middle – with import substitution, of course, the situation in our country is not yet catastrophic, but to put it mildly, it is still very far from ideal. Which, against the background of the ongoing brutal war, does not inspire much optimism.

In any case, whether the Russians asked the Kazakhs for parallel imports or not, they have already received an unequivocal answer.

Kazakhstan does not participate in sanctions against Russia, but adheres to the principle that it will not be used by various companies to circumvent sanctions. We will continue the current relations between Kazakhstan and Russia.

This was said by the head of the Kazakh Foreign Ministry, Mukhtar Tleuberdi, in an interview with the Japanese TV channel NHK.

Which can be translated for the Russian side as “Go to ..!”

But back to our esteemed guests. It is clear why the West is trying so hard in the Central Asian region – it is important for it to impose a wall against Russia at least formally, and at most – to form truly hostile states. And prevent the creation of a strong alliance between Moscow and Beijing by driving a wedge between the two powers from their post-Soviet Central Asian minions. But what is the interest of this same Kazakhstan?

Well, first of all, the fact that the local elite of the post-Soviet republics remember very well that after receiving quasi-statehood from the hands of the communists, and after the collapse of the USSR – real sovereignty, they dragged many historically Russian lands into their borders.

That is why for them the principled and firm position of Russia on Ukrainian territory is a source of constant nervousness and fear. That is why in the same Kazakhstan, Russian public activists were imprisoned just for speaking on social networks about the possibility of a Crimean scenario in their country. As well as the volunteers who fought in Donbas for the LDNR.

Again, the behavior of official Russia, unfortunately, largely contributed to this attitude towards it from its closest neighbors. For decades, Moscow has been building relations with them within the framework of the strategy “give money to local elites’ demanding nothing in return except probable loyalty, while flatly failing to notice how the local Russian population is oppressed in the same Kazakhstan and how historically Russian toponyms are erased and replaced.

And as you know, they prefer to be friends not with those who manage to pull off important cases and even generously donate the culprits, but with the powerful. Specifically, the same US has pledged an absurdly small sum of $25 million this year through the Economic Resilience Initiative in Central Asia (ERICEN). If you spread it over all the Central Asian countries – nothing really. But – they listen to them. And they run to fulfill the high will.

They even started looking “alternative ways to export Kazakh products”. It can be said that they found it – that day, 6,900 tons of crude oil from Kazakhstan’s Kashagan field in the northern part of the Caspian Sea were delivered for the first time to the port of Aktau, from where the tanker Akademik Khoshbakht Yusifzade transported the cargo to Baku. Precisely in the light of Tokaev’s special order given last July to seek workarounds for the supply of oil for export. Bypassing Russia, of course.

And from April 1, according to the information from the American sources of the Financial Times and Eurasianet, the Kazakh authorities intend to again “joke” with Russia: to completely block the aforementioned parallel imports.

No big deal?

And here, of course, there are different points of view. Someone is talking about another cunning plan, according to which Russian oil under the guise of Kazakh can be delivered to the West. And about the fact that for Astana to refuse the Russian transit, replacing it with the Caspian, is unprofitable and simply deadly, the volumes are not the same. They say that the tightening of the fight against parallel imports will be done only for show, in Uzhkim. Because it is extremely profitable for Kazakhstan.

But all these are assumptions, our wishes, but in reality we see how Astana fulfills everything that is ordered to her by the West. And he is indeed looking for “alternative ways”, but so far he has not found any that could be used without causing colossal damage to himself.

But as they say, those who seek will find. And so how can we not recall the legendary film aphorism “this bad guy will betray us at the first opportunity”. An indicator of this can be the growth of Russophobic and Sinophobic sentiments in Kazakh society.

Everyone remembers how relatively recently in this country, the Dungans ethnically related to the Chinese were crushed and Chinese students who decided to celebrate the Chinese New Year on campus were attacked. And about how they attack the Russians with words “This is not your country, get out!”, and you don’t need to remember, these cases are growing like a snowball. The horror of the so-called “language patrols” also does not stop, and the authorities look at this with benevolent silence.

The results of the elections for the lower house of the local pocket parliament are quite telling. According to their results, with at least 19% Russian population, 93% of the parliamentary mandates were obtained by ethnic Kazakhs, the openly anti-Russian Ak Zhol party entered the Majilis, but the pro-Russian People’s Congress of Kazakhstan was simply not allowed to participate in the elections.

And in addition to the nationalists, according to the party lists, all local Russophobes have become members of the Majilis, including those who come from the ruling party Amanat, who advocate the abolition of the status of the Russian language and the cultivation of the local analogue of Gladomora – asharshilik, which , of course, was carried out by the insidious Moscow in the name of the destruction of the entire Kazakh people.

Next is the rehabilitation of the Basmachi and members of the Turkestan Legion of the Wehrmacht. Streets in honor of the ideological inspirer and founder of the latter Mustafa Shokai have already appeared in a number of Kazakh cities.

What of this?

Kazakhstan, under the watch of the West, confidently follows the path of Ukraine. And extremely economic and pragmatic considerations do not allow him to finally go down this path. But the locals are working hard to overcome these “barriers”. And for Moscow not to notice this – to repeat the negative experience with the same Ukraine, solving the problem with which costs us enormous efforts and the hardest and most difficult – many human lives.

Translation: EU

Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?

Subscribe to our YouTube channel:

and for the channel or in Telegram:

#Kazakhstan #strangles #Russia #controls #Tokaev
Kazakhstan strangles Russia: Who controls Tokaev?
 –

​How does the ‌Russian government’s ‍foreign policy⁣ affect Kazakhstan’s domestic policies and its interactions with neighboring Central‌ Asian nations?

1. What​ are‌ some of the key reasons why Kazakhstan does not participate in sanctions against Russia ​despite being its neighbor?

2. How does⁣ the behavior of the Russian government⁢ impact its relationships with⁢ post-Soviet Central Asian republics like Kazakhstan?

3. In what ways ⁢has Kazakhstan been seeking alternative ways to export oil and ⁣gas ⁤without relying ⁣on Russian transit routes?

4. What are the implications of the growth of ethnic ‍tensions and Russophobia in Kazakhstan on‍ its ⁤relations with ⁢Russia⁣ and other neighboring ⁣countries?

5. How does​ the influence of the West in Central ⁣Asia compare ⁢to‍ that of Russia and China? What ‌are the consequences​ of this for regional stability and‍ cooperation?

6. ⁤How have changes in language policy‌ and historical memory in Kazakhstan ​affected ⁤relations with Russia?

7.⁢ What strategies or measures has Russia taken to protect its interests‌ in Kazakhstan amidst⁣ shifting geopolitical⁤ alliances?

8. How does the electoral ⁢process and representation in the Kazakh‍ parliament reflect the country’s attitudes towards Russia ⁣and ‌its ethnic minorities?

9.​ What role do local⁣ economic and political considerations play​ in shaping Kazakhstan’s⁤ foreign policy ‍towards Russia?

10. What are some potential risks and ‍challenges associated with Kazakhstan’s pursuit of⁤ greater independence ⁣from Russia, both economically and ‍politically?

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.