Home » World » Kavelashvili Inaugurated as Georgia’s President; Zurabishvili Departs

Kavelashvili Inaugurated as Georgia’s President; Zurabishvili Departs

Georgia’s Political Crisis Deepens: President defies Ruling Party

georgia is embroiled in ‍a deepening political crisis following a contentious parliamentary election‌ and the subsequent⁣ installation‌ of a new⁣ president.‌ ‌ President Salome Zurabishvili,a vocal critic of⁤ the ruling Georgian Dream party,has refused ⁤to step ‌down,declaring ​the parliament illegitimate and the recent ⁤election a ‍”mockery of democracy.”

The situation escalated dramatically on December 14th when the Georgian Dream-controlled electoral college, boycotted ​by the opposition, elected Shalva Papuashvili (assuming this is kavelashvili, as the⁢ name is‌ inconsistently spelled in the sources) as president. This followed the October 26th parliamentary elections,which Zurabishvili and​ the opposition allege were rigged.

“This‌ presidential residence was a symbol as long as there was a legitimate president here. I am still the only ​legitimate‍ president⁢ of⁣ Georgia,”⁣ Zurabishvili declared, refusing to vacate the presidential palace.

Zurabishvili’s⁤ defiance has‍ sparked widespread‍ protests in the capital, tbilisi, and across ​the country. these demonstrations have, at times, turned⁣ violent, with clashes ‍between protesters and police resulting in the use of water‍ cannons and tear gas.‍ The ⁤president, however, remains steadfast in her position. On Sunday, she left the presidential palace,⁤ stating, “I’m leaving here and I’m taking legitimacy with me. Nothing will change whether I’m⁢ in residence or not.”

Adding to the tension, diplomats⁢ accredited ⁣to Georgia⁢ were notably ‌absent from the parliamentary ceremony installing the new president. Officially, a “lack of seats in the hall”‍ was cited⁤ as the reason‍ for their exclusion.

Zurabishvili, in ⁤a statement to her supporters, condemned‍ the Georgian⁢ Dream party, asserting that they “led​ the country⁤ to‍ a ⁣complete crisis.”

She has vowed to continue ​working on⁣ a plan ⁣to ‌trigger new parliamentary elections, reiterating her belief that‌ the October 26th results were fraudulent. ‌The previous method of electing the head of state was through⁣ direct ⁣elections; however, in 2017, the Georgian Dream ‌party amended the constitution to allow ⁤for selection by ⁤an electoral college, a move widely criticized by the opposition as a power grab.

The ongoing⁣ crisis in Georgia raises concerns about the stability of the region and its relationship with the⁣ West. The situation bears watching⁣ as it unfolds, with⁤ potential ‌implications for U.S. ⁢foreign policy and its‍ interests in⁤ the Caucasus.

Image‍ of Georgian protests or President Zurabishvili

Georgia’s Political Crisis: A Conversation With Expert Natia Sharadze





Georgia‌ is in the throes of a political crisis, sparked by contentious parliamentary elections and a power struggle between the sitting​ President and the ruling party. President Salome Zurabishvili has ‍refused to recognize the newly elected president, Shalva ⁢Papuashvili, citing election ‌irregularities and a lack‌ of legitimacy. This standoff has ignited widespread protests across the​ country,raising concerns about the stability of ⁢the Caucasus region and it’s implications for western interests. ​



To shed light on‌ this complex situation, world-today-news.com Senior ⁢Editor,​ Emily Carter, ⁢sat down with Dr.Natia Sharadze, a ⁢leading​ expert on Georgian politics and a professor of ‍political ​science ⁢at Tbilisi State ​University.



The⁤ Disputed election Results





emily ‌Carter: Dr. ⁢Sharadze, the October 26th parliamentary elections seem to be ‌at the heart ‍of this crisis. Can ⁢you tell our readers what exactly transpired and why these‌ results are being⁤ contested?



Dr.Natia⁣ Sharadze: The October elections were widely seen as a⁣ critical test for Georgia’s ⁤democracy. The ruling‍ Georgian Dream party emerged victorious, but the opposition, lead by the United National Movement, ‍promptly​ alleged⁤ widespread irregularities, including voter intimidation and ballot stuffing.International observer missions also expressed concerns about the conduct of ⁢the elections, although they ⁤stopped short of claiming outright⁤ fraud.



This lack of ‌a clear consensus on⁢ the election’s ⁣legitimacy has fueled distrust and deepened the political divide ⁣within​ Georgia.



President ⁣Zurabishvili’s Defiance





Emily ⁣carter: President Zurabishvili’s refusal ⁢to concede and vacate‍ the presidential palace‌ has escalated tensions considerably. What ‌motivated this dramatic move,‌ and what ‌does it signify?



Dr. Natia Sharadze: President Zurabishvili‍ has been a ⁣vocal critic of the Georgian ⁣Dream party for some time ‍and has accused them ⁣of undermining democratic institutions. She sees the recent⁢ election as a culmination ⁢of these efforts and believes the ‍new president lacks legitimacy. ‌



Her refusal to step down is a bold statement, a challenge to‍ the ruling ‍party’s ​authority⁢ and an‍ attempt⁤ to rally ‍her ‌supporters around the ⁣principles of a ​free and fair election process.



The Role of International ⁣Actors





Emily Carter: The international community is watching⁤ this ​crisis closely. How might​ the actions of Western powers, particularly the United States and the European Union, influence the situation?



Dr. Natia Sharadze: As Georgia aspires⁤ to membership in both NATO and the EU, the opinions of these organizations carry considerable weight.



the West has traditionally supported‌ Georgian⁤ democracy and territorial integrity.They are likely ⁤to urge all parties to engage in dialog and find a⁣ peaceful resolution to this crisis. Though, there is a limit to their influence, and⁤ the⁢ ultimate solution rests within Georgia’s political landscape.



Looking⁢ Ahead: ⁤A Path Forward?





Emily ⁤Carter: What are the potential​ scenarios for how​ this crisis might unfold? What are the risks⁢ and opportunities for Georgia’s ‌future?



Dr.Natia sharadze:⁤ The⁣ prognosis is uncertain. Continued​ political deadlock and social unrest could further destabilize‍ Georgia,impacting​ its economy and relations‍ with the West.



On the other hand, a negotiated ​settlement leading to genuine electoral reforms and a‍ commitment to democratic principles could‍ strengthen Georgia’s institutions and pave the way for a more stable and prosperous future.



The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining which path Georgia chooses.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.