There is no kick in that penalty. And even if they were new rules, they have no nobility to become justice because exclude the referee, make it a machine elementary, almost vulgar. They keep him from the embarrassment of slow motion. There is a touch of the hand and everyone is acquitted, any nuance is useless. To justify the result I can add that Juve in the second half there was, with the movement on the field he deserved his first unjust penalty, and this is already a bold speculation. But in the circle of the race everything looks frankly old, as in the days of Carosello when the slogans became laws, like the principle by which a team is given things that for others would not be thinkable.
–
a game destined to become like those of Turone’s goal canceled, like that of Muntari’s goal that Galliani still keeps as a call in his mobile. Justice, even when correct, just to be fair, never simple application. That catalog, archive, arithmetic. Child’s play. The referee is not needed. A judge interprets, contextualises. The first goal can only be avoided by removing the player’s arms. What have we done to football to save the referees and their weaknesses? And how much will we have to accept their mistakes, their applications from pure classical mechanics? They made the desert and call it technology. The rest of the game was at first exceptional Atalanta paid enough but not completely in the second when Juve found pace. But after Malinovskyi’s goal, the fabric of superior justice took the field, the current difference between Atalanta and Juve became tangible. All canceled by the second penalty.
–
heavy don’t win games like that, seeing entire seasons distracted. Best wishes to Juve to finish his race with the ninth championship. Contextualizing a well-deserved prize. But not after games like this.
–
–
July 12, 2020 (change July 12, 2020 | 07:13)
© RESERVED REPRODUCTION
–
