Jakarta –
The judge at the South Jakarta District Court (PN Jaksel) did not accept the pretrial lawsuit of the inactive KPK chairman Firli Bahuri in the alleged extortion case against former Minister of Agriculture (Mentan) Syahrul Yasin Limpo (SYL). Deputy Chairman of Commission III Ahmad Sahroni appreciated the judge at the trial.
“Appreciation to the judges who have carried out their duties professionally,” said Sahroni when contacted, Tuesday (19/12/2023).
According to the Treasurer of the NasDem Party DPP, currently Indonesia needs great judges, so that the law can be enforced fairly.
“It takes great judges in this republic so that all legal processes are actually enforced,” said Sahroni.
Sahroni also hopes that the alleged extortion case against SYL, who is a NasDem cadre, can be handled fairly.
The reason why the judge did not accept Firli’s pretrial
The judge did not accept the pretrial lawsuit submitted by Firli Bahuri. In his considerations, the judge stated that Firli’s pretrial application mixed formal material with material outside the formal aspect.
This was read by single judge Imelda Herawati in the decision hearing held at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday (19/12/2023). Initially, the judge quoted Article 2 paragraph 2 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016 which regulates pre-trial.
“Considering, that further the provisions of Article 2 paragraph 2 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016, regulate pre-trial examination of applications regarding the invalidity of the determination of a suspect, only assessing formal aspects, namely whether there are or are at least 2 valid pieces of evidence and do not enter into the material of the case, said the judge.
The judge also stated that the applicant’s arguments could not be used as a basis for a pretrial submission. Because, according to him, there are a number of arguments which are the main material of the case.
“Considering, that referring to the legal reasons for the pretrial application submitted by the a quo petition, the judge found that there were legal arguments or reasons which could not be used as a basis for filing a pretrial, namely on the grounds of letters A numbers 2, 3, 4, and 5 and letter B because it is the main subject matter,” he said.
The judge also stated that the arguments in the petitum had mixed up formal material with material outside the formal aspect. So the judge was of the opinion that the basis of the applicant’s pretrial application was vague or unclear.
“Considering, because of the arguments placed which supports requested “The applicant, as explained previously, apparently has mixed formal material with material outside the formal aspect,” he said.
Watch the video ‘A series of judges’ considerations do not accept Firli Bahuri’s pretrial application’:
(aik/idn)
2023-12-20 01:43:55
#Chairman #Commission #III #DPR #Appreciates #Judge #Accepting #Firlis #Pretrial #Lawsuit
