Home » today » News » José Ignacio de Mendiguren, duro contra Patricia Bullrich: “Vuelve a proponer lo mismo” | Como en 2001, la precandidata a presidenta propuso un “blindaje”

José Ignacio de Mendiguren, duro contra Patricia Bullrich: “Vuelve a proponer lo mismo” | Como en 2001, la precandidata a presidenta propuso un “blindaje”

Patricia Bullrich, the presidential‍ candidate for‌ Juntos por ⁤el Cambio, ‍made‌ a bold promise during a television interview on Monday night. She ⁤pledged to eliminate currency controls‌ and unify the exchange rate through a “shielding”⁤ of dollars⁣ and​ taking on more debt with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) if‍ she wins the ⁣general elections.

“Good memory because they​ did that. They had a shielding in 2001,” sarcastically remarked José Ignacio de Mendiguren, the Secretary of Industry and Productive Development of⁤ the Nation, referring ⁤to⁣ Bullrich’s ‍campaign promise, on AM750.

He ⁤continued, “They‌ ate up ​40 billion dollars – I don’t know if they all arrived or not – ⁣and⁤ despite that, three months later they had ‌to go to zero deficit by taking away ⁤the retirees’ salaries. They broke Argentina’s social contract, ⁣something⁣ immoral.”

In this context, the former president of the Argentine Industrial Union ⁣(UIA) stated that some candidates “speak⁤ lightly” and that some campaign proposals‍ are “reckless.”

“They talk about management and started by lifting currency controls​ and ended up imposing them, they ​started by eliminating export taxes and ended up imposing them, and they started by freeing‍ tariffs and ended up freezing them,” he pointed out on Aquí, Allá y en Todas Partes.

Finally, Mendiguren spoke about ⁤the measures announced by Sergio Massa on ​Sunday, the pre-agreement with the IMF, and⁢ the market’s ⁢reaction ‌on Monday.

“There are many people ⁤who bet ⁤on the crisis, we ⁤have been hearing it for a long time, it is a wishful thinking. The economic team continues to work and continues to try to negotiate with the ⁤IMF, but not at the expense of sacrificing growth or job creation,” ‌he concluded.

Read more: [link to news article]
detail‌ photograph

How can the ⁤equation‍ 3x + ‌2 = ⁤4(x – 1) be simplified and solved

‍3x + 2 = 4(x -⁢ 1)

3x +‍ 2 = 4x – 4

3x – 4x =‌ -4 – 2

-x = -6

x = 6

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.