Home » World » Jeju Air Crash: 177 Dead in South Korea Airport Disaster

Jeju Air Crash: 177 Dead in South Korea Airport Disaster

Aviation Mystery: Expert Baffled by south Korean Plane Incident

A puzzling aviation incident in South Korea has left a leading expert scratching⁤ his head. The ⁣incident, details of which are still emerging, has⁢ prompted questions about pilot procedure and ​emergency ​response.

Aviation commentator⁤ and expert Geoffrey Thomas shared his analysis, highlighting several unusual aspects ‍of the event. He ⁢stated, “It appears as though there has been a bird strike ⁣and one of the engines, the right-hand engine⁢ was impacted. This would‌ have caused a lot of pressure in the cockpit.”

Thomas’s assessment points to a potential bird strike ‍as the initial trigger. The impact on ⁢the engine,⁤ he explained, would have created important stress within ⁣the cockpit surroundings. This raises questions about the ⁣pilots’ subsequent actions.

Adding to​ the mystery, Thomas suggested a​ possible oversight: “With ⁢all the checking ​and cross-checking going on ‍relating to this engine failure, it ⁣could ⁤well be that [the] pilots simply forgot to put ⁢the‍ landing gear ⁢down.”

The possibility of a​ forgotten landing gear deployment is particularly concerning. Thomas ⁢noted that pilots​ receive warnings about large​ flocks of mallard ducks​ near ‌Muan Airport⁢ during certain times of the year. He emphasized, “Pilots see warnings near Muan airport at this​ time ‍of year ​for flocks of mallard birds, which can ⁤be very large.”

Placeholder image‍ of Geoffrey ⁣Thomas
A screengrab of Geoffrey‍ Thomas during⁣ a news interview.

Even ⁢if the landing gear wasn’t deployed, standard ‍procedures should‍ have mitigated the‌ risk. Thomas explained that, “But if the landing gear was⁣ not deployed, warnings⁢ would have sounded in the cockpit, and the⁤ undercarriage could be manually deployed if a problem prevented ‍the landing gear from descending.” The lack ‌of ⁤a successful manual deployment further adds to‍ the intrigue.

The expert continued, “Whether the engine situation ‍was such that they felt they didn’t have time to do that we don’t no, but‌ they would have declared an ‌emergency and therefore the firefighting ‌units should have been ‌runway-side” and prepared for ‌a gear-up landing. Standard emergency procedures include deploying foam on the ‌runway to cushion the impact⁢ in such scenarios.

Despite the unusual circumstances, Thomas ⁢acknowledged South Korea’s strong​ aviation safety record. He commented, “Thomas says that South ⁢Korea and its airlines are considered ‘industry best practice’ -​ both the aircraft and the airline have an ‘excellent safety ⁢record’.” This makes the incident ⁢all the more perplexing.

Concluding his assessment,⁤ Thomas expressed his overall ‌uncertainty, ‍stating, “A lot ⁣of things about this tragedy ⁢don’t make sense.”

This incident underscores ⁤the complexities ‌of aviation safety and the importance of thorough⁤ investigation⁢ into even seemingly minor incidents. The ‌aviation⁣ community ⁣awaits further⁣ details and the official investigation’s findings.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.