Commenting on the reduction of the penalty for Al-Ahly goalkeeper Mohamed El-Shennawy, from 4 matches to one match, Jamal Al-Ghandour, former head of the Referees Committee, affirmed that it is preferable to study any decision before issuing it so that it is not referred.
Al-Ghandour said, in televised statements, that reducing sanctions is a matter that happens a lot, especially in matters in which the decision is appealed, but it is better to study so that the penalties are not reduced, saying: “Amending the decisions of the Football Association has happened a lot and it is not new, but it is not a decision. It is true because it was necessary to be patient before issuing any punishment. “
The tripartite committee of the Football Association decided to reduce the penalty imposed on Mohamed El-Shennawy, the player of Al-Ahly club, to one match, while increasing the financial penalty to 50 thousand pounds, to be paid before he participates in the matches, after reviewing the referees committee, which decided that the player should receive the penalty assigned to the player. The holder of the card.
The committee also approved the recommendations and decisions issued by the competition administration to save the complaint of Wadi Degla Club against the participation of the Tala’a Al-Jaish club, the player Mohamed Nasif, as his participation was verified by obtaining only one warning, as well as reducing the penalty of the player Mahmoud Wadih, the player of the Pyramids Club to 4 matches instead of 8 Matches with an increased financial penalty to reach 200,000 pounds, provided that they are paid before the player’s return to play.
The tripartite committee in charge of managing the Egyptian Football Association, in its meeting held this evening, Wednesday, headed by Ahmed Mujahid, approved the recommendations issued by the medical committee of the federation during the joint meeting with the medical devices of the first division clubs, provided that these recommendations are communicated to the clubs..
– .
