Home » News » Jadwiga Emilewicz: a woman’s freedom ends when she becomes pregnant. A deputy on protests after the Constitutional Tribunal’s verdict on abortion
Jadwiga Emilewicz: a woman’s freedom ends when she becomes pregnant. A deputy on protests after the Constitutional Tribunal’s verdict on abortion
I see human life as really the highest value – said Jadwiga Emilewicz in the TVN24 program “I check”. The deputy assessed that “a woman’s freedom ends when she becomes pregnant because it is limited by the child’s freedom.” She also spoke about President Duda’s project on abortion. She admitted that she had talked to Jarosław Kaczyński on this subject.
–
In the program “Check” on TVN24, Jadwiga Emilewicz, who introduced herself as a non-member of the Law and Justice parliamentary club, was asked about her attitude to the abortion compromise. “My opinion on this has evolved in recent years, not only when I am a politician,” she said.
–
In Emilewicz’s opinion, “the role of a politician is to maximize good”. – This is how I perceive my role, in this I see human life as truly the highest value – she pointed out. “It’s not up to us to decide when it starts,” she added.
–
– When I listen to postulates that are shouted out that “my stomach, my business”, this is a sentence for me that speaks of some fundamental misunderstanding of the human being – said the deputy. In her opinion, “a woman’s freedom ends when she becomes pregnant because it is limited by the child’s freedom.”
–
video">
–
This statement aroused great emotions and comments on social media. Emilewicz herself posted a post on Twitter, in which she wrote: “I can see that my statement about restricting a woman’s freedom with a child’s freedom arouses great emotions. Pregnant women change their eating habits, do not drink alcohol – precisely for the sake of the child. in ‘Checking’ “.
“It is difficult for me to agree with the manner and mode of conducting these protests”
Emilewicz on TVN24 was also asked if she understood the rage she sees on the streets of Polish cities. She replied that it was “a very difficult question”. She emphasized that “her views and attitude to the protection of life and when it begins” she expressed many times.
–
– It is difficult for me to agree with the manner and mode of conducting these protests. Profanity, profanation, shouting or very clearly formulated by the leaders of these strikes very political postulates. I fundamentally disagree with these postulates – she said.