What happened on March 8, 2014 when a Boeing 777 flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing mysteriously disappeared from radar screens? This is what François Renault, author of ” MH370 – the mysterious disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines flight »(Favre) and guest of the Grand Témoin du jour.
It was six years ago. On March 8, 2014, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 went missing in the greatest mystery. At 1:20 am, the aircraft made a final contact in the Gulf of Thailand. Then nothing. “Flown, evaporated, volatilized”. Back then, qualifiers to describe the bewildering story of MH370, now infamous, hit the headlines. Worthy of a Hollywood scenario, the story of this flight connecting Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) to Beijing (China) is nevertheless cold in the back.
The United States involved?
Six years later, 239 people are still missing and the relatives of the victims are still desperately looking for answers, like Ghyslain Wattrelos, whose wife and two children are among the victims. “All the people looking at this story hold the same conclusion, namely, the official thesis doesn’t work. Me that’s what I’ve been saying since the first week”, He declares at the microphone of Louis Daufresne. Comments shared by François Renault, author of “MH370 – the mysterious disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines flight” (Favre). This business manager has been carrying out the investigation for five years, focusing only on ” on aeronautical facts“. For him, “it is not at all an accident. This hijacking happened for a reason that was probably premeditated”, He says. According to him, the United States and China, two leading world powers in direct competition for decades, are involved in this aviation tragedy. First hypothesis, “there were passengers on the plane who had know-how that we did not want to see arriving in China”. Second hypothesis: “the hold of the plane contained an element that the Americans did not want to arrive in China”.
“Falsified data”
To support this thesis, François Renault and Ghyslain Wattrelos point to a body of evidence implicating the United States. First, why was the FBI there the next day. “They took the pilot’s flight simulator, but no report has ever been released for six years”, Wonders Ghyslain Wattrelos. Why were there military planes ready to fly? “The US Embassy in France has been leading our lawyers for six years. Explain to me what the FBI did. It is obvious that the Americans are responsible for this disappearance!”. As for the only official data available to investigators, provided by Inmarsat (satellite communication network), “I say it was falsified”, Comments François Renault. “The route reconstructed by Inmarsat does not fit on an aeronautical plan and does not correspond to any automatic pilot plan. There is no autopilot mode that can explain this path. Indeed, these data show that the plane made a U-turn, went up the Strait of Malacca but it never made a left turn towards Australia, it continued straight towards the central region of Indian Ocean”. However, the research was first concentrated for a week with extraordinary means in the China Sea, “so that after a week we are told that Malaysian radars saw the plane’s radar thousands of miles away. So we’ve been lied to from the start”, Specifies Ghyslain Wattrelos.
For François Renault, all the hypotheses are possible: complicity of the pilot, landing to make the plane disappear (…), which validate the whole thesis of military reason. For him, it is a drone system present in the plane that could have been at the origin of this military hijacking.
–
