The fact that we are talking about a football team does not mean that everyone can talk about it as happens with the ball. The investigation into the alleged false accounting of Juventus unfolds on a hyper-technical territory, very slippery for those who do not know the matter in depth. You can, of course, throw it in the caciara and blather about “very serious violations” or “insignificant infringements” with the same heated attitude with which an offside is discussedmom the probability of making a bad impression rises dramatically. In particular, the question of the “salary maneuver”, which could become crucial both in criminal proceedings and in sports, is a topic that has seen many experts express themselves in different ways. The interpretation in the public domain, at the moment, is that of the prosecutors, therefore that of the prosecution, which therefore considers the work of Juventus to be outlawed. It is not written anywhere, however, that it is the right interpretation and to express oneself in advance, before listening to the other version, not only violates the sacred legal principle of the presumption of innocence, but also the equally sacred principle of common sense which would impose silence when one does not know the subject well.
Sign up for the Tuttosport League Fantasy Championship and win fantastic prizes!
