Home » Business » Israeli Forces Kill 22 in South Lebanon as Residents Attempt to Return Home

Israeli Forces Kill 22 in South Lebanon as Residents Attempt to Return Home

nTensions Escalate as Israeli Forces Remain in‌ South Lebanon beyond Ceasefire Deadline

BEIRUT — Israeli forces killed 22 people in south Lebanon on ‌January 26 as ⁤a deadline for their withdrawal passed, sparking outrage and defiance‍ among thousands of residents attempting to return ‍to their homes. The ​incident has deepened the crisis in a region ‌already scarred ‍by months‌ of conflict between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah. ⁣

The violence unfolded as Israel⁤ announced it would keep troops in the south‍ beyond the ⁢January 26 deadline ​ set out‌ in a⁤ US-brokered ceasefire.⁢ Israel claims Lebanon has not fully enforced the agreement’s terms, which ​require the removal of ‌Hezbollah‍ arms and ⁤the deployment ⁢of the Lebanese army in the region.

Lebanon’s military, which reported one of its soldiers among the dead, accused Israel of delaying its withdrawal. The ‌Hezbollah-israel ‌conflict, which ran⁣ parallel to the Gaza war,⁤ peaked ⁢in a major Israeli offensive‍ that displaced over a million people and left Hezbollah significantly weakened.

Lebanon’s⁢ health ministry stated that 22 people were killed and 124⁣ wounded in multiple locations as Israeli forces attacked citizens attempting to enter their‌ still-occupied towns. The⁣ Israeli military defended its actions, stating that troops “fired⁣ warning shots to remove threats” and apprehended “a number of suspects… that posed an imminent threat.”

Hezbollah’s al-Manar television ⁤station broadcast footage of residents moving toward villages early⁤ on January 26, some carrying the group’s flag and images of fighters killed in the war. An Israeli military spokesperson accused Hezbollah‌ of trying to “heat up‌ the situation” and​ promised ⁢to inform ‌residents of ⁢safe ​return areas “in the near future.”

Hezbollah lawmaker⁢ Hassan​ fadlallah ⁣emphasized ‌Lebanon’s commitment to the ceasefire but⁣ accused​ Israel of violating ⁤it with ‍US support. “What is happening in the border villages is a liberation by⁢ the power of the people, and our‍ people‍ will not be broken by the Israeli army,” he told Reuters.

The top UN official in Lebanon and the head of UN peacekeepers in the south warned that conditions ​were “not‍ yet in place” for the ‍safe⁢ return of citizens. ⁣“The fact⁢ is that the timelines⁣ envisaged” in the⁤ ceasefire “have not been met,” they saeid in a statement. ⁢

Hezbollah lawmaker ⁤Ali Fayad accused Israel ‌of using “excuses” to pursue a “scorched earth policy” in border areas, making ⁤the return of displaced residents ​“unachievable.”‍ Meanwhile, ​Lebanese President Joseph Aoun urged restraint and trust⁣ in the Lebanese military, asserting that ‍“Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity are⁤ non-negotiable.”

Israel has not specified how long its ​forces will remain in the‍ south,where it claims to be seizing Hezbollah weapons and‌ dismantling its infrastructure. The⁤ offensive aimed to secure the return of tens of thousands of Israelis displaced by⁢ Hezbollah rocket fire.

the conflict ‌began on October 8, ‍2023, a⁤ day after Hamas attacked Israel, ⁤triggering the Gaza war. Israel intensified ⁣its campaign against Hezbollah ​in September⁢ 2024, ‍killing its long-time ‌chief​ Hassan Nasrallah. ​

Hezbollah warned on January 23 that any violation of the 60-day deadline would be a “flagrant violation” of the ceasefire and an “infringement on Lebanese ⁤sovereignty.” While⁢ refraining from threats to ​resume attacks, the group urged the Lebanese state to use “all means necessary… to ‌restore the land.”

| Key Points | Details |
|—————-|————-|
| casualties | 22 killed, 124 wounded in Israeli ⁣attacks on January 26 |
| Ceasefire Deadline | January⁣ 26, 2025 | ⁣
| Israeli ‌Troop ⁤Presence | Extended beyond deadline, citing non-compliance with ceasefire terms |
| Hezbollah’s ‌Stance | Accuses Israel of ⁣violating ceasefire, urges Lebanese‌ state action |⁢
| UN‍ Assessment ⁢| Conditions not yet​ safe ‍for return of displaced residents |

As tensions simmer, the region ​remains on edge, with the international⁤ community closely monitoring the situation. The path to peace appears fraught ⁣with challenges, as both sides dig in their​ heels. ⁢

For the latest updates on this ⁣developing ‍story,join ST’s telegram channel.

Tensions Escalate as Israeli ‌Forces Remain in South Lebanon Beyond Ceasefire Deadline

as​ the region grapples with the fallout ⁤from the recent Israeli attacks in South Lebanon,tensions continue to rise‌ following the expiration of the January 26 ceasefire deadline. in this‌ interview, Senior Editor of World-Today-News.com speaks with Dr. samir Khalaf, a renowned Middle East geopolitical analyst, to delve into the complexities of ‍the situation, the role of Hezbollah, and the broader implications for regional ​stability.

Understanding ​the ​Ceasefire Violations

Editor: ⁤ Dr.‍ Khalaf, thank you for ⁤joining us. The ceasefire agreement brokered by the ‌U.S. set a clear deadline of January ⁤26 for Israeli troops to withdraw from South Lebanon. Why⁤ do you think ⁤israel has ​chosen to extend its‍ presence ‌beyond this date?

Dr.Khalaf: Thank you for⁣ having me.Israel’s decision ⁢to extend its ‌military presence ⁤in South Lebanon stems from its assertion that Lebanon has not‍ fully complied with⁣ the⁢ ceasefire terms. Specifically,israel claims that Hezbollah’s arsenal remains intact in‍ the region, and the Lebanese army has not adequately deployed ​to enforce the agreement.​ This has created a deadlock, with Israel viewing its presence as necessary to ensure​ its security interests.

Hezbollah’s Response and Lebanese Sovereignty

Editor: ⁢Hezbollah has accused Israel of ⁤violating Lebanese sovereignty by remaining in south Lebanon. How notable is this accusation⁣ in‍ the context of‍ the wider conflict?

Dr.Khalaf: ⁤ The accusation‍ is ⁤highly significant. Hezbollah has‍ long positioned itself as a​ defender of Lebanese ⁢sovereignty, and this rhetoric resonates deeply with its supporters. By framing Israel’s actions as ⁤a violation of national sovereignty,⁣ Hezbollah is attempting to⁣ galvanize domestic ⁢and international support. Though,it’s worth noting that Hezbollah’s own‌ presence and activities in ⁢the region ‌have⁤ also been a⁢ point of‍ contention,complicating the dynamics of Lebanese⁣ sovereignty.

The Human Cost and Displacement

Editor: The ​recent Israeli⁣ attacks resulted in 22 deaths and 124 injuries,‍ with many attempting to return ‌to their homes.what does this say about the humanitarian situation‍ in South Lebanon?

Dr. ⁣Khalaf: The human cost of this conflict cannot be overstated. Over a million peopel were displaced during⁢ the peak of hostilities, and the recent violence underscores the challenges ​faced ⁤by those attempting to return home. The UN has rightly ⁣pointed out that conditions are ⁢not yet safe for the return of displaced residents. This highlights the urgent need for a enduring resolution that prioritizes the safety and well-being ‍of civilians.

International ⁤Community’s Role

Editor: The international community ⁣is closely⁢ monitoring the situation. What role can external ​actors play in de-escalating tensions and ensuring compliance with the ceasefire?

Dr. Khalaf: ⁤ The ‍international community,especially the United Nations and key ‍regional powers,has a critical role to play. ⁣Mediation efforts must​ focus on ensuring both sides⁣ adhere to the ceasefire terms while ⁢addressing the⁣ underlying issues that fuel​ the conflict. ‌This includes addressing Hezbollah’s military presence, ​israel’s security​ concerns, and the broader⁣ geopolitical tensions in the‍ region. Without decisive international engagement, the risk of renewed hostilities remains high.

Looking ahead: A Path⁣ to Peace?

Editor: Dr. Khalaf, do⁢ you see a path to peace in ‍the near ​future, or are we likely to see⁢ further escalation?

Dr.‍ Khalaf: The path‍ to peace is fraught‍ with challenges.‌ Both sides are entrenched in their positions,⁤ and the stakes are high. However, I believe that sustained diplomatic ⁢efforts, combined with confidence-building measures, could⁤ pave the way for⁤ de-escalation. It will require political will, compromise, and a commitment to addressing the root causes⁢ of the‍ conflict. While the road ahead‌ is uncertain, the choice—continued violence—is untenable for all parties involved.

conclusion

The situation​ in South Lebanon remains volatile as ‌Israeli forces‍ extend their presence beyond the ceasefire deadline,and ⁢Hezbollah accuses Israel of violating Lebanese sovereignty. The human cost of the conflict ​continues to mount, with displaced residents struggling ⁣to return home.While the ​international‌ community remains engaged, the ‍path to peace is uncertain, underscoring the need⁣ for decisive diplomatic efforts ⁢to​ address the​ underlying tensions and ​prevent further escalation.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.