The enemy estimates that if the party’s responsibility for the Megiddo operation was proven, it was ready for the repercussions of the operation’s results, even if it led to war, which indicates that the so-called “Israeli deterrence system” was greatly shaken.
-
Sayyed Nasrallah: Operation Megiddo confused the enemy at all levels
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah’s recent statements bear important connotations, as they came after the operation of Megiddo Junction, north of occupied Palestine, whose threads have not been revealed yet, and are still disturbing the enemy’s security and political parties, as the operation is a serious breach of the security system of the enemy, who spoke of the infiltration of a “terrorist”. From Lebanon, loaded with an explosive belt and a 15-kilogram klimagor device, and enemy sources announced that the port infiltrated from Lebanon into occupied Palestine through a ladder and not through a tunnel. In the aftermath of the operation, the enemy’s security minister, Yoav Gallant, threatened that his army would respond to the party responsible for the complex, complex operation with many threads, adding that his entity would find the appropriate place and method to respond.
While enemy sources indicated that the Lebanese Hezbollah is responsible for the operation in coordination with the Hamas movement, the enemy is still in the stage of gathering information about the merits and details of the Megiddo operation, which prompted the Secretary-General of the Lebanese Hezbollah, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, to make remarkable statements, in which he confirmed that “Israel” launched a war on Lebanon that will lead to the opening of a battle in the entire region, and that his party’s silence on the incident that took place in the town of Megiddo is part of the political, media and military battle.
Nasrallah believed that “the Megiddo operation confused the enemy at all levels.”
Nasrallah’s statement carried a clear threat to the enemy, saying: “The resistance in Lebanon is in its covenant and its decision. Any attack on any person present on Lebanese territory, whether he is Lebanese, Palestinian, or of another nationality, or an attack on a Lebanese region, we will respond to him decisively and quickly, and this must be to be understood.”
The enemy estimates that if the party’s responsibility for the Megiddo operation was proven, it was ready for the repercussions of the operation’s results, even if it led to war, which indicates that the so-called “Israeli deterrence system”, since the July 2006 war, was greatly shaken, according to Assessment of the enemy’s position.
Sayyed Nasrallah’s statements reflect greater confidence in the resistance’s capabilities to confront the enemy, and a higher level of readiness and readiness. They also reflect the enemy’s failure in the “battle between wars” policy. The battle of the “Jerusalem Sword” in May 2021, in which the Jerusalem-Beirut equation was inaugurated, and that aggression against Al-Aqsa means a regional war.
The enemy seeks to link Hezbollah’s efforts to engage the enemy, for internal reasons, as a result of the political and economic crisis in Lebanon, which has emerged since the dispute over the Karish gas field, as it threatened that it would be able to target the Karish platform and all the enemy’s platforms and naval vessels if gas extraction began in September. , and assaulted Lebanon’s rights and its maritime borders, and despite the passage of about 7 months since the case, the path for Lebanon to obtain its rights in the Mediterranean gas is still faltering.
The enemy believes that Hezbollah allowed the Palestinian resistance organizations to act against it from the Lebanese arena, and the party’s policy emerged during the battle of “Saif al-Quds”, which confirmed that the Lebanese and Palestinian resistances witnessed coordination between the two parties and an exchange of information through the follow-up of field leaders from Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. for the course of the battle.
It seems that Hezbollah is reading the developments of the enemy’s internal environment, which is witnessing sharp unprecedented divisions, affecting all sectors of the enemy’s society, including the “army”, which reveals the sincerity of Sayyed Nasrallah’s description of “Israel” as weaker than a spider’s web.
The party also received news of the signing of the Iranian-Saudi agreement, and the Kingdom’s efforts to restore relations with Syria with great satisfaction, as it reflects the failure of the normalization countries to isolate and weaken the axis of resistance, and will lead to greater understanding in the region and a retreat in the course of the “Abraham Accords”, and the strengthening of the strength of the Islamic Republic in Iran is the party’s most prominent ally and the axis of resistance.
Hezbollah’s orientations and positions have also been affected by changes in the international environment, which is witnessing a decline in American hegemony, and the emergence of the beginning of international alliances hostile to the United States, especially China and Russia. Israel’s status is also witnessing a decline at the regional and international levels, due to the fascist tendencies of the Netanyahu/Ben government. Gvir/Smotrich, and the internal crisis of the entity.
The enemy builds its policy towards the fronts on separating them, while the resistance seeks to raise the level of linkage between the arenas, as Sayyed Nasrallah considered the attack on any Lebanese or Palestinian person inside Lebanon an aggression that he will respond to quickly and forcefully, thus linking the Palestinian and the Lebanese, and preceded by the link between the Jerusalem line -Beirut, which means that the enemy’s fear of a multi-front war is justified, and that the consequences of Sayyed Nasrallah’s threatening statements may translate into a military response, in the event that the enemy violates the rules of engagement.
The enemy’s fears of the resistance’s axis are increasing, in light of the recent shuttle meetings between Sayyed Nasrallah and the leaders of Hamas and Jihad, and in light of the Megiddo operation, and the impact of the enemy’s crimes in Palestine, and the rise in the level of resistance and Palestinian commando operations, especially in the occupied West Bank.
Sayyid Nasrallah’s threats came at a precise time, coinciding with the blessed month of Ramadan and the possibility of an escalation of attacks on Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque, which are expected to double during the current month of Ramadan, as the Jewish Passover falls in the middle of Ramadan for a period of 8 days, and it is expected to witness major incursions into the courtyards of the mosque. Al-Aqsa, and the performance of biblical rituals inside it, which will make Hezbollah stand with the Palestinian resistance in defending the first qiblah of Muslims, given the equation established by Sayyed Nasrallah, between Jerusalem and Beirut, which embodied new rules of engagement with the enemy, whose title is Jerusalem.
