/ world today news/ Before the upcoming parliamentary elections, the problems are known: the demographic catastrophe, corruption, uncontrolled inflation, poverty and mediocre living standards, profound problems in health care and education, mass emigration of the able-bodied, the disturbed labor market, the import of gender ideologies instead of values.
But inin connection with the danger of purposefully involving our country in the military conflict in Ukraine, the controversy surrounding our position and the topic of nneutrality in international relations. In Prof. Georgi Genov’s analysis of neutrality as a political choice in an up-to-date interpretation, he undeniably concludes that: 1. Neutrality, as a new image and policy of Bulgaria. It is not possible, it is not on the agenda, resp. a real goal in the foreseeable future as the vision of the majority of the party-state overarching and current legislation. 2. This is “sealed” with the contractual membership in NATO and in the EU, incl. and on a bilateral basis. 3. Not just independence, but also self-reliance is excluded. Except within the framework of the assigned NI, agreed upon, approved by non-national or supra-national organizations, their bodies and institutions in the spheres of security, defense, foreign relations. 4. The current controversy is about refraining from a continuation of “our policy” (ie full participation in war).
Is our allied subservience and lackeyness inevitable with the risk of being turned into a springboard to the war in Ukraine and the danger of military mobilization of our children and men of the middle generations who have not emigrated to “safer” and distant countries? And turning them into cannon fodder for Zadocenia, and Bulgaria a target of the hard-to-predict opponent, fighting with blood brothers and sisters in culture, religion, and writing. For which the Bulgarian states have also made a decisive contribution in the past.
But which cliché should we choose: “time is running out”, “the end justifies the means” or “the agreements (for ceding sovereign rights to the Bulgarian state) must be respected” at any cost? Hungary started building a new constitution after 2010 (the old one with additions and amendments was from 1949). Israel, Great Britain, New Zealand live peacefully and civilized without written constitutions, Germany with a basic law and still without a valid peace treaty after World War II. And our Constitution, adopted on 13.07.1991, was amended and supplemented without the Supreme Court by laws in no. 85 of 26.09. 2003 in SG, no. 18 of 2005, in no. 27 and no. 78 of 2006, in no. 12 of 2007, no. 100 of 2015. And although according to Art. 4.(2) The Republic of Bulgaria guarantees the life of the individual and in Art. 28 “Everyone has the right to life…” with the option of putting the lives of Bulgarians at risk because of allied obligations, there is more to think about. As well as above the wording of Art. 5. (4) that international treaties … take precedence before the norms of internal legislation that contradict them. Without being a legal expert, precedence does not mean automatic subordination. A subject for interpretation. Historical truth requires that we also remind that our Constitution was not preceded by a national poll (referendum, plebiscite), but by a Great National Assembly. But the Tarnovo Constitution of 1879 was only adopted by the Supreme Court, because at that time at least 80-90% of the population was illiterate.
Which of the three authoritative political coalitions or parties should those who wish to avoid the risk of being mobilized to fight directly for foreign fratricidal interests, as well as their relatives and sympathizers, choose? In any case, not for artificial “one-slogan one-dayers”. And in my opinion, especially for none of the first 2-3 “in the ranking” outlined by the sociological agencies, who subsisted on “cheats from the government” and from foreign interests. Elected partly with a bought vote and by “established mechanisms”, they blocked the state and municipal already “colonial”-puppet administration. Most often with incompetent and corrupt officials who dare not speak a word against their bloated state, cronyism, clientelism and local feudalism, to eliminate commissions and unnecessary commercial intermediaries, always at the expense of the voter-taxpayer.
Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for our Telegram channel:
#allied #submission #inevitable
