I often hear men, including my husband, talking about… “lasciviousness damages life” and suspect that they use that as an excuse to be lazy in “pampering their wives”. What’s the truth?
Th.Thuy (HCMC)
Getting straight to the point, you rely on two reasons to believe that “lasciviousness damages life”: One is that energy is closely linked to health and longevity, the more you spend it, the more energy you lose. Second, the principle is completely concretized by the planet and the proposition that the loss of one thing leads to the loss of another remains the same.
People who follow this theory say that the “number” of sperm given to each man is finite, regeneration is slower than pouring down a river, so being “frugal” will help you live a long life, while wasting it will quickly empty your pockets.
Photo for illustration purposes only – Jcomp
There is a lot of evidence that life expectancy is completely quantified. Sex, here excessive sex, is an activity that causes waste and waste causes exhaustion, so it is entirely possible to participate in trimming the length of a certain “quantity” as mentioned.
Of course, their lifespan is not shortened in a crude way, like “when sperm is depleted, the day is near the earth and the sky is not far away”.
Note again that the basis of this “shortening string” theory is for transition cases. How many times in bed per day or month is too much? The way a strong man compensates for his flesh is different from a man who is sick now and then tomorrow. I’ve had too many sexual partners to count and are still healthy and vice versa.
Therefore, the definition of sexual “transition” depends on each specific case.
For now, there is enough theory for women to have a basis to fight, especially in the case of encountering a husband who uses the theory of premature death to deny his duty. There is no basis for you to believe that pampering your wife, whether at the average level or working a little overtime, can make a measurable dent in your life expectancy.
Is it true that women’s sexual demands cause husbands to resort to birth, old age, sickness, and death to defend themselves?
If that’s true, then “adultery hurts life” is just an excuse, meaning that reasoning with him has no effect, unless you take the initiative to reduce it.
Not to mention a husband who was having health problems and was on the verge of sudden death, so it was reasonable for him to survive. It is not a loss of life but an unexpected death if the women do not see their husband’s situation.
