Correction: The headline of a previous version of this story on IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley misspelled his name.
Gary Shapley, an IRS whistleblower, has made new allegations regarding the investigation into Hunter Biden, the son of U.S. President Joe Biden. Shapley claims that his inquiry was prevented from following certain leads that could have potentially led investigators to the current president.
In an interview with CBS News, Shapley, who has worked with the agency for over 14 years, stated that the investigation into Hunter Biden was conducted in an irregular manner and would have ended differently for someone without Biden’s connections. He also alleged that his team was prevented from taking further measures that could have implicated President Biden.
Shapley further claimed that the investigation into Hunter Biden should have resulted in additional charges, including felony counts, due to personal expenses being taken as business expenses. These expenses allegedly included payments for prostitutes, sex club memberships, and hotel rooms for drug dealers.
House Republicans have criticized Hunter Biden’s recent plea deal, calling it a “slap on the wrist.” They have pledged to continue their investigations into both the president and his son, as well as allegations of interference by government agencies during the investigation into Hunter Biden.
President Biden, however, denied ever lying about speaking with his son regarding his business dealings. The president and first lady Jill Biden expressed their support for Hunter Biden in a statement released by the White House, stating that they love their son and will continue to support him as he rebuilds his life.
The House Ways and Means Committee, which has been leading an inquiry into potential interference during the IRS investigation into Hunter Biden, publicly released testimony from two IRS whistleblowers who worked on the case. The committee’s chairman, Rep. Jason Smith, stated that the whistleblowers described how the Biden Justice Department intervened and overstepped in an effort to protect Hunter Biden.
The committee will continue its investigation into Hunter Biden and whether President Biden may be implicated in any interference. Smith emphasized the importance of treating all taxpayers equally and holding agencies accountable.
It remains unclear if these new allegations will impact Hunter Biden’s plea deal. The agreement, reached with U.S. Attorney David Weiss, still needs to be approved by a federal judge. A hearing has been scheduled for July 26 to process the plea agreement, but it is uncertain if the judge will consider the allegations from the IRS whistleblowers in their decision.
U.S. Attorney Weiss has not publicly commented on the case since announcing the plea deal earlier this month.
What potential implications could the substantiation of Shapley’s claims have on the credibility and administration of President Joe Biden
From a money pool, which included funds from Chinese companies and other foreign sources.
According to Shapley, the investigation was initially launched to look into potential financial improprieties by Hunter Biden. However, he asserts that it quickly became evident that the probe was being hindered and manipulated to protect the current president.
Shapley alleges that they were directed to ignore evidence and leads that could have potentially incriminated Joe Biden. He claims that their requests for subpoenas and search warrants were repeatedly denied, and they were discouraged from pursuing certain avenues of investigation.
Furthermore, Shapley asserts that the investigation should have delved deeper into Hunter Biden’s financial dealings, especially regarding his overseas connections. He believes that the extent of the financial improprieties and potential corruption implicates not only Hunter Biden but also Joe Biden himself.
These allegations come amidst heightened scrutiny of Hunter Biden’s business dealings and their potential impact on the Biden administration. The elder Biden has repeatedly denied any involvement or knowledge of his son’s business activities.
However, Shapley’s claims raise questions about the impartiality and integrity of the investigation into Hunter Biden. If substantiated, they could potentially have serious implications for the Biden administration, casting doubt on the president’s credibility and raising concerns about possible corruption.
It remains to be seen how these allegations will be addressed and if they will lead to further investigations into the Biden family. Whether or not Shapley’s claims are credible, they serve as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in high-level investigations, particularly when it involves individuals with close ties to those in power.
This article sheds light on concerning allegations made by an IRS whistleblower regarding blocked leads in the Hunter Biden tax and gun investigation. The need for transparency and thorough investigation is paramount, and these allegations raise important questions that must be answered.
This article sheds light on the alleged blocking of leads in the Hunter Biden tax and gun investigation. It raises important questions about the integrity and impartiality of the IRS. Accountability is crucial in such cases, and a thorough investigation is imperative to ensure justice is served.