Iran fights with Hezbollah and they don’t fight for it

Marouf Al-Daouk wrote in “Al-Liwaa”:

Iran’s missile response to Israel, last Wednesday night, absorbed some of the outrage and public discontent that has befallen Hezbollah and its followers, as a result of the Iranian regime standing by and ‘ look, against Israel’s target on the heart of Hezbollah. leaders, led by Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, and carrying out the biggest missile attacks on his bases and headquarters in Lebanon, without doing anything, and even more so, There was no major response from the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ali Khamenei, threatening a military response to the extent of Israel’s widespread war against the party and the assassination of Nasrallah, the main ally of the regime, in to implement the project sectarian groups to control the area, while the President of the Republic, Mehdi Pezeshkian,. announced that the party cannot stand against Israel, and Mohammad Javad Zarif, the president’s aide, said, “Iran has no obligation to protect the party and it has given a lot of money, members- give him weapons and training, but he has been brought in by Before Israel.

Iran’s missile response did not eliminate the fears and doubts of the party’s supporters regarding the Iranian regime’s pursuit of a conciliatory policy with the United States of America, which President Pezeshkian expressed publicly more than once, in which he expressed his willingness to do it. open to the outside world and the United States of America in particular, and along with his positions with courting to the American people which the supporters of the party believed to be a sign of a new policy that the regime intends to continue with his arch-enemy, the American, who is hostile to the party and supports Israel, and he fears that this policy will be at the expense of the party and the continuity of his relationship with the Iranian regime.

Things did not stop there, but suspicions increased even more, when it became clear that the Iranian regime had informed the American administration directly or through friendly countries of its intention to respond to Israel, under the accusation of retaliation for the assassination of the head of state. the political bureau of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, and Nasrallah, apparently, and specifying the goals before they do it. , and reduce the damage and impact on the ground.

And as it was, and Iran’s missile response took place, and it was a revised version of the regime’s theatrical response, to the deadly missile strike that Israel led against the Iranian consulate building in Damascus last April, when it targeted Iran’s leaders. Revolutionary Guard, and most of the missiles from Iran were shot down before they arrived.

Now the American administration is leaking information about the coordination between Washington and Tel Aviv, to select specific targets from Iran, so that Israel will carry out its threats to respond to Tehran’s missile strike, which does not give into the sites of nuclear facilities, and will not harm the Iranian Regime to the core, which means, in conclusion, that the exchange strikes are going to register formalities and tickle the feelings of support, and it is only to keep the policy of openness proposed by the reformist president of Iran with the blessing of. the leadership of Iran, in terms of the interest of continuing the regime, even at the cost of hitting and targeting its main arm, Hezbollah, at the hands of Israel, as is happening now.