To date, a whole lot of efficiency assessments have been carried out of AMD’s new era Ryzen 9000 collection, particularly Ryzen 9 9900X Even the official has shared some recreation knowledge comparisons As a competitor, Intel Arrow Lake-S , whether or not he can compete this time, there are numerous questions Individuals are very .
Lately, the outcomes of Core Extremely 9 lastly got here out Though it’s quicker than i9-14900K with a TDP of 250W, it’s considerably decrease than AMD Ryzen 9900X doesn’t want such excessive energy consumption to surpass it right here.
Intel Core Extremely 9 Arrow Lake is as much as 18% quicker than i9-14900K, however requires 250W energy consumption
Lately @jaykihn0 shared the operating rating comparability desk of Arrow Lake -S on The ES2 rating is considerably decrease, so it may be ignored straight and simply take a look at the QS rating:
https://twitter.com/jaykihn0/standing/1816099937500684755
Though @jaykihn0 did not say what mannequin it’s, as a result of it is in comparison with an i9-14900K, it is most probably a Core Extremely 9. It is unlikely to be in comparison with a Core Extremely 7. The extent is totally completely different.
There are 5 take a look at software program used, specifically CrossMark, WebXPRT4, Speedometer 2.1, Geekbench 5.4.5 and Cinebench R23.
The attention-grabbing factor is that ARL-S QS doesn’t lead as an entire, however solely CrossMark, Geekbench 5.4.5 and Cinebench R23, WebXPRT4 and Speedometer 2.1 operating on Chrome. However the i9-14900K wins.
In additional element:
- Within the CrossMark take a look at, ARL-S leads the i9-14900K by about 6%, with a rating of 2587
- Within the Geekbench take a look at, the single-core ARL-S leads the i9-14900K by lower than 1%, whereas the multi-core leads by 14%.
- Within the Cinebench R23 take a look at, ARL-S leads the i9-14900K by about 18%
- Within the WebXPRT4 take a look at, ARL-S lags behind the i9-14900K by about 4%
- Within the Speedometer take a look at, ARL-S lags behind the i9-14900K by about 10%
For simpler comparability,@harukaze5719 We additionally made a chart and in contrast it with the take a look at knowledge of the R9 9950X ES model shared on the AnandTech discussion board.R9 9950X At solely 160W, the Cinbench R23 rating is sort of the identical because the ARL-QS 250W After upgrading the R9 9950X to 230W, it’s properly forward:
It may be seen that the stress on Intel have to be very excessive this time, and the AMD Ryzen 9000 collection is properly ready.
supply:Video playing cards
