Given the percentage of damage caused by the vehicle, which was covered by the victim’s insurer, the defendant did not demonstrate the existence of this situation.
Understanding that the insurer named as guarantee by the defendant -Paraná SA- did not prove that the plaintiff’s car had total destruction insurance, the 8th Civil and Commercial Chamber of Córdoba rejected the appeal filed by that company, which argued that , having proven that the damage to be repaired to the damaged vehicle exceeded 80% of its value, this should be covered by the plaintiff’s insurance.
Access all our content
2023-05-22 07:04:06
#total #destruction #vehicle #defendants #insurance #pay #damages #accident