Facebook knows how harmful Instagram can be for young people, especially teenage girls. The platform generates negative images of them, incitement to suicide and anorexic problems. Facebook prefers to remain silent, however.
Internal documents that the Wall Street Journal was able to watch, give a singular view of how Facebook is dealing with issues on its platform. Earlier this week, the newspaper revealed that a large panel of personalities were exempt from following the rules in force on Facebook. This time, he publishes a survey carried out by Facebook, but ignored by the general public, on the degree of harmfulness of Instagram.
Thus, in an internal presentation from 2019, we literally find the following words: ‘We accentuate body image problems in one in three teenage girls’. A survey carried out a year later confirms that Instagram makes them feel worse about their bodies. Other internal reports also point to growing concerns and depression over Instagram.
Suicide inducements
But it doesn’t stop with worries or a low self-image. Thirteen percent of young Britons and six percent of young Americans with suicidal tendencies attribute it to Instagram.
Surprisingly, Instagram’s parent company Facebook isn’t denying the numbers. In a press release posted on his blog, the company wishes to emphasize that the article in the Wall Street Journal focuses mainly on the negative side of things. She refers to a survey, according to which people feel better connected through their platforms. This sounds like the words of a tobacco producer who regrets on the one hand that we write that people die because they smoke, but on the other hand also that we do not insist on the pleasant company of a cigarette.
Human Body-Focused Platform Says It Is Also Putting A Lot Of Effort To Oppose Cyberbullying, Self-Harm, Anorexia, And Other Prominent Instagram Effects to make the platform more secure. This is how it is possible to hide ‘likes’ and for links to exist with aid organizations. Here too, it looks like the equivalent of a pack of cigarettes with the telephone number of the tobacco shop on it.
New promise of improvement
Traditionally, Instagram has further stated that it will be more transparent about its own surveys in the future. The user must here again consider these remarks with all the usual circumspections. Facebook has a long reputation for hiding information, serious distortions and minimization, or even simply promising improvement, without anything really changing. It is only when the image problem becomes too severe that action is taken.
Two recent examples of the above: the data breach at Facebook, which the company has long ignored, before calling it simply a sector problem. An internal email that Data News inadvertently received confirmed that Facebook wanted to minimize the problem.
The fact that Facebook will be more transparent in the future seems just as much to be another empty promise. Until recently, the company published a transparency report. Soon, however, we learned that she had concealed a previous report that could tarnish her image.
Internal documents that the Wall Street Journal was able to view, give a singular view of how Facebook is handling issues on its platform. Earlier this week, the newspaper revealed that a large panel of personalities were exempt from following the rules in force on Facebook. This time, he published a survey carried out by Facebook, but ignored by the general public, on the degree of harmfulness of Instagram. Thus in an internal presentation of 2019, we find literally the following words: ‘We let’s make the body image problems worse in one in three teenage girls. A survey carried out a year later confirms that Instagram makes them feel worse about their bodies. Other internal reports also point to growing worries and depression over Instagram, but it doesn’t stop with worries or low self-esteem. Thirteen percent of young Britons and six percent of young Americans with suicidal tendencies attribute it to Instagram. Surprisingly enough: Facebook, the parent company of Instagram, does not deny the numbers. In a statement posted on its blog, the company wishes to emphasize that the article in the Wall Street Journal focuses mainly on the negative side of things. She refers to a survey, according to which people feel better connected through their platforms. This sounds like the words of a tobacco producer who regrets on the one hand that we write that people die because they smoke, but on the other hand also that we do not insist on the pleasant company of a The Human Body-Focused Platform Says It Is Also Going To Counter Cyberbullying, Self-Injury, Anorexia And Other Instagram Effects in order to make the platform more secure. This is how it is possible to hide ‘likes’ and for links to exist with aid organizations. Here, too, it looks like the equivalent of a pack of cigarettes with the tobacco shop’s phone number on it, and Instagram traditionally says it will be more transparent about its own investigations in the future. The user must here again consider these remarks with all the usual circumspections. Facebook has a long reputation for hiding information, serious distortions and minimization, or even simply promising improvement, without anything really changing. It is only when the image problem becomes too important that action is taken.Two recent examples of the above: the data breach at Facebook, which the company has long ignored, before simply calling it sectoral problem. An internal email that Data News inadvertently received confirmed that Facebook wanted to minimize the problem, and the fact that Facebook will be more transparent in the future seems to be another empty promise as well. Until recently, the company published a transparency report. Soon, however, we learned that she had concealed a previous report that could tarnish her image.
– .
