Political Center / Full Report
▲ Gao Hongan’s thesis is controversial and the Information Policy Council will not rule out taking action. Wang Dingyu believes the situation is more serious than Lin Zhijian’s.
The Information Policy Council said today (5) that the University of Cincinnati doctoral thesis of Gao Hongan, a People’s Party lawmaker, is nearly 80% similar to the Information Policy Council research paper. , if Gao Hongan does not deal with whether or the two sides do not reach an agreement, legal measures will be taken. In this regard, DPP lawmaker Wang Dingyu listed three points of analysis on Facebook, stating that “the objective situation is actually more serious than the case of former Hsinchu mayor Lin Zhijian!”
Zhuo Zhenghong, CEO of the Information Policy Council, said today in the Legislative Yuan that the most important thing for academic work is to clearly state the source, the copyright. According to the two comparisons of the Information Policy Council, Gao Hongan’s paper is useful for the copyrighted part of the Information Policy Council. The first comparison found 70% to 80% and the second comparison was above 80%, which is not within the scope of fair use. The policy requires respect for copyright.
Wang Dingyu analyzed that, in the first place, academic applications are not considered violations, but materials that do not indicate the source and are not specifically mentioned are subsidized by the China Resources and Policy Council. 80%, who are suspected of plagiarism; second, it is suspected of plagiarism. Doctors report traveling for more than 500 days and still use the NSFC full-time full-time salary to study their doctorate; third, they use taxpayers’ money to get a degree and cite the materials paid for by the NSCC as a dissertation without specifying it and getting it. The degree jumped immediately to Hon Hai.
Wang Dingyu believes: “The above objective situation is actually more serious than the case of Lin Zhijian’s thesis!”
