Some of the statements of the Speaker of the Parliament, Konstantinos Tasoulas, who during a Parliament event for Spyros Moustakles, said that “ostentatious, appropriating, monopolizing, and much more punitive and vengeful patriotism, are not patriotism, it is hypocrisy and barbarity”.
Specifically, in the wake of the expulsion of the Messinian politician from the blue faction, the president of the Parliament said that “Spyros Moustakles, who from now on will be housed here in the Hellenic Parliament, looks at us with sweetness, with his open eyes , with the halo of trial, with the weapon of the soldier, with the weapon of the National Army, but of the democratic of politics. The soldier of the constitutional obligation, of the overthrown Constitution of 1952 by the dictatorship, which in its very last article said that “the observance of the present constitution is dedicated to the patriotism of the Greeks”. And that Moustakles accepted this dedication and appreciated it and paid it.”
He also added: “by whom?” Of those who have made a show of patriotism, this continues even today. Not just by those who appropriated patriotism, this continues today. Not just by those who monopolized patriotism, this continues today. But from those who made patriotism revenge for those who, in their opinion, did not meet the standards. So, ostentatious, appropriating, monopolizing and much more punitive and vengeful patriotism is not patriotism, it is hypocrisy and barbarism.”
Read also:
Tempe Crime: Provocative Marinakis for not examining cargo of commercial train – Talked about conspiracy theories
PASOK for Tempi: “Convincing answers are needed immediately for the lost material”
Disturbance in Cyprus over Samara’s statements: “They were not gifts, they were a discussion”
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘726515947549353’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#Indirect #remarks #Tassoula #Samara #Obvious #patriotism #barbarism
How do you respond to criticisms that your definition of “true” patriotism may exclude certain groups or viewpoints within society? In what ways can you ensure that your vision of patriotism is inclusive?
Questions for Konstantinos Tasoulas:
1. You have made some direct and indirect remarks about patriotism in your speech. Can you expand upon your definition of what constitutes “true” patriotism? How do you differentiate between patriotism and what you described as “ostentatious, appropriating, monopolizing, and much more punitive and vengeful” forms of patriotism?
2. You mentioned that you believe there are individuals who use patriotism as a weapon for political gain. Can you provide specific examples of such behavior, and how does it differ from your concept of patriotism?
3. Your speech focused on the importance of preserving democracy and the Constitution. In your opinion, how do the actions of politicians who prioritize patriotism over democratic values threaten these foundations?
Questions for Spyros Moustakles:
1. You mentioned in your response that you appreciate the dedication of the Parliament to your work. Could you elaborate on what this means to you personally and how it relates to your political beliefs?
2. Do you agree with Konstantinos Tasoulas’ characterization of patriotism as being exploited for political gain? If so, what steps can be taken to identify and address these issues within the political system?
3. Furthermore, do you believe there is a place for patriotism in politics, and if so, how can it be expressed in a way that upholds democratic values and respects the rights of all citizens?
