Home » News » India Rejects New Chinese Counties Near Ladakh as Illegal

India Rejects New Chinese Counties Near Ladakh as Illegal

India Protests China’s Actions in Disputed Ladakh Region and Brahmaputra River Project

India has issued a formal protest to China regarding the creation of two new ⁣counties in the Hotan Prefecture, a region encompassing territory claimed by India⁣ as part of Ladakh. The proclamation, made by China’s ‌Xinhua‌ news agency on December 27, 2024, ⁤ has further escalated tensions between the two nations.

Ministry of External⁤ Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal
Ministry ⁣of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir ‍Jaiswal. | Photo Credit: Youtube/MEA

In ‍a press briefing‍ on ⁤Friday, January 3,‍ 2025, Ministry of External ‌Affairs ‌(MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated, “We ‍have ​never accepted ‍the illegal Chinese occupation of ⁤Indian territory in this area. Creation of new counties will ‌neither have a‍ bearing on India’s ⁢long-standing and consistent⁢ position regarding our sovereignty over the area nor⁤ lend legitimacy to‍ China’s illegal and forcible occupation of the same.” ‌ He ⁤confirmed that ​India had lodged ‍a “solemn protest” with china ⁤through official‌ diplomatic channels.

The newly formed counties, He’an and‍ Hekang, are ⁤located in‍ the Hotan Prefecture (also known as⁢ Khotan in⁤ India), a region encompassing parts of Aksai Chin, a territory claimed by both India and china.This action is ‍seen by India ​as a further attempt by Beijing to solidify its control over the disputed area.

This protest comes ‍on the heels of a December ‍18, 2024, ‌meeting between National Security‍ Adviser Ajit Doval and Chinese Foreign⁤ Minister Wang Yi, aimed at de-escalating tensions stemming from the ‌2020 Galwan valley⁤ clashes in eastern Ladakh. ⁢The creation of the new counties casts a shadow over ⁢the‌ progress of these ‍talks.

Adding to the concerns, Mr. jaiswal also expressed⁤ India’s deep apprehension regarding China’s plans ⁤for a massive hydroelectric dam⁢ project on the Yarlung Tsangpo River ​(known ​as the Brahmaputra in India), which flows ‌through Arunachal pradesh and Assam. He emphasized, “As a lower riparian‌ state with established user rights…”​ The ⁤statement highlights India’s worries about the potential impact of⁣ the dam‍ on water resources crucial to its northeastern states.

The implications of these actions extend beyond the immediate ‍border dispute. The potential impact on‍ water⁤ security for millions of Indians living in the Brahmaputra River basin is a ‌critically importent concern, raising ‍questions about ⁣the long-term stability of the⁢ region and the future‌ of ​India-China relations.

China’s Brahmaputra Dam: A $137 Billion ⁤Project Raises concerns for India

China’s announcement of ⁤a ​massive new dam on ⁢the Brahmaputra River, a‍ project estimated ‍at $137 billion, ‌has sparked concerns in India. The dam, planned⁤ for the Yarlung Tsangpo ‍River (the Brahmaputra’s name in Tibet), is poised ⁣to ⁣become⁣ the world’s largest,⁣ dwarfing​ even the Three Gorges Dam. This ambitious undertaking, revealed on December‌ 25, 2024, via a Xinhua news report, has raised questions about‌ openness and potential impacts on downstream nations.

The lack of​ prior ⁣official interaction to India, a ⁢nation sharing the river, ⁢is a significant point of ⁢contention.A spokesperson for India’s Ministry of External Affairs ⁣(MEA) noted the ⁤unusual lack of diplomatic notification, highlighting the need‌ for collaboration between‌ countries ⁣sharing major waterways. The‌ MEA’s‌ concerns were conveyed to Chinese officials through both diplomatic and ‍expert channels.

“To the waters of the ​river,we have consistently expressed,through expert-level as well as diplomatic channels,our views⁤ and ‌concerns to ⁢the Chinese side⁤ over mega​ projects on rivers in⁣ their territory,”

said the MEA spokesperson.

World’s Largest Dam: A⁣ Geopolitical ‌Power Play?

The sheer scale of the project—a $137 billion⁢ investment in a dam designed‌ to surpass all others—raises questions about its potential impact on the ⁣region. ⁢ While China ‍maintains the dam will not ​affect ‌downstream areas,‌ India remains wary.​ ‍The lack of ‌prior consultation fuels anxieties about potential disruptions to water flow and​ ecological balance,impacting ⁣agriculture and livelihoods in India.

India has repeatedly⁢ urged ‍China ‍to ensure the project​ doesn’t negatively affect downstream​ countries. ⁣ the MEA ⁤spokesperson emphasized India’s commitment to monitoring the ⁤situation and protecting its interests.

“The⁢ Chinese side‌ has been⁢ urged to ensure that the interests of downstream ​states of the ⁣Brahmaputra are not harmed by activities in upstream areas. ⁣We will continue ‍to⁤ monitor and take necessary measures to protect our interests,”

the spokesperson stated.

The situation underscores the complex geopolitical dynamics in the region and highlights the importance ‌of international cooperation in managing shared resources.The lack of transparency surrounding the project’s environmental impact ⁤assessment further exacerbates concerns for India ‌and other ‌downstream nations.

This⁢ developing situation will undoubtedly continue to be closely watched by international observers and policymakers alike. The potential ramifications for regional ⁣stability and water security remain significant.

Published January ‌3,2025


China’s Brahmaputra Dam ⁤Project Raises Red Flags: An Expert ​Weighs In





India has expressed growing concern ⁢over China’s proclamation of a massive ‍new dam on the Brahmaputra River, a ⁣ project estimated at a staggering ‍$137 billion. ⁣The project promises to be the world’s largest, dwarfing even​ the⁣ Three Gorges Dam. This ‌has sparked worries about ⁢its impact on downstream nations like India, ⁤especially regarding water⁢ security⁤ and environmental balance.



To explore the complexities of this situation, Senior Editor of ⁣world-today-news.com, [Editor name],‌ spoke with dr. Amit⁣ Sharma,a leading expert on transboundary water resources and India-China relations.



Senior Editor: ‌ Dr. Sharma, thank you for joining us today. This proposed dam project on the Brahmaputra has sent ⁢ripples⁢ of anxiety through India. Could you shed some light on the reasons behind india’s concerns?



Dr.‌ Sharma: Of course.​ India’s apprehension stems from several factors. First and foremost is the sheer scale of ⁣the project. A $137 billion investment signals a massive engineering⁢ feat ⁤with ‌potentially ⁤notable downstream consequences. We lack ‍detailed⁢ information about the ​dam’s design and operation, wich raises concerns about potential water flow disruptions‌ and ecological impacts.



Senior Editor: China claims the dam won’t harm downstream areas. How do you assess this assurance?



Dr. Sharma: ⁢ While China assures us that downstream nations won’t be negatively affected, these assurances lack openness. We haven’t seen comprehensive environmental impact assessments or ⁣detailed plans for mitigating potential risks. This lack of transparency fuels anxieties‌ and​ understandably so.



Senior⁣ editor: The Brahmaputra is a lifeline for millions in India, notably in Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. what are the potential repercussions if‍ China’s ⁢control over water⁢ flow is ⁤significantly altered?



Dr. Sharma: The ‌Brahmaputra is​ indeed a vital ‌resource for India. Millions rely on it⁣ for drinking water, irrigation, and hydroelectric power.Any disruption to the natural flow could have severe consequences ⁣for agriculture, livelihoods, and ecosystems downstream. We risk⁣ facing water scarcity, flooding,‌ and ecological damage if the dam is operated without proper consultation and consideration‌ for downstream needs.





Senior Editor: ‌What are your thoughts on the lack of prior consultation with India‌ on such ⁣a significant project?



Dr.Sharma: It’s highly concerning. Sharing ‌a ⁤major river​ like the Brahmaputra ‍requires⁤ ongoing dialog and cooperation. Unilateral actions without prior ⁣consultation erode trust ​and can sow discord. It underscores ​the need‍ for stronger‌ mechanisms ‌for transboundary water management and diplomacy.



Senior Editor: You mentioned‌ the need for stronger ⁣mechanisms. what steps can ⁢India and​ China take to ⁢address these concerns and foster greater cooperation?





Dr. Sharma: ⁢We need a renewed commitment to open interaction and data sharing. Joint​ studies on the dam’s potential impacts and mitigation ‍measures are crucial. Establishing a⁢ robust, ⁢institutionalized framework for ⁤managing the Brahmaputra river ​basin could help build trust and ensure equitable water sharing.





Senior Editor: Dr. Sharma, thank you for​ your invaluable insights.This situation certainly underlines the delicate​ balance of ⁢managing ⁤shared resources and the importance of obvious, collaborative ⁢diplomacy.



Dr. ⁤Sharma: My pleasure. It’s a complex issue that ​requires sustained attention and dialogue from all stakeholders.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.