“The President of the Republic Tamás Sulyok responded in writing to my inquiry on Friday. As you might bear in mind, I requested the president to publicly declare that he grants clemency to those that help within the implementation of the end-of-life choices of terminally sick sufferers uncovered to inhuman struggling,” Dániel Karsai wrote.
Referring to the reply of the top of state, he added: “In keeping with the president of the republic, this step would take away the legislative powers of the Parliament and the judicial powers of the courts. Such train of the ability of pardon would even be opposite to the particular, retrospective and distinctive character of this energy. Lastly, in response to the President, such a press release might encourage folks to commit the crime of aiding and abetting suicide.”
On the identical time, Dániel Karsai commented in response to the president’s reply:
As a place to begin, I wish to state that I already extremely recognize the truth that a state chief gave a significant reply. I don’t agree with the president’s place, however it can’t be referred to as out of skinny air.
He then introduced his personal opinion: “Making the assertion in query wouldn’t detract from the distinctive nature of the grace. In spite of everything, every case should be examined independently. Eradicating the powers of the Parliament and the courts can also be not an acceptable argument, as a result of the President of the Republic can cancel a conviction that conflicts with the Primary Regulation. Individually determined in every case, however even frequently on the identical subject. The truth that the presidential assertion might probably encourage some folks to assist others finish their lives with dignity will not be a drawback, however a bonus. If that had been the case, fewer folks can be compelled to finish their lives in an inhumane method.”
Dániel Karsai hooked up the letter of the top of state to his submit, which will be considered right here. Within the letter, the place of the President of the Republic was justified in additional element than above, and it was written:
In view of the above, regardless of all his sympathy, the President of the Republic can not fulfill Mr. Lawyer’s requests. We will solely affirm what he expressed within the private assembly with you, it’s clear that Mr. President – identical to his former colleague – stands by you, follows your wrestle with compassion, respects and acknowledges your profession and your will to do it.
An essential determination could also be made within the case subsequent week
We beforehand wrote about the potential of a choice on the case of Dániel Karsai on the European Court docket of Human Rights in Strasbourg subsequent week. This was additionally introduced by the constitutional lawyer in a earlier Fb submit.
Comply with Index on Fb too!
I am following you!
