“Between all or nothing, there is a fair measure, and above all a solution. Of course, you mention financing problems. But I remind you that the operator of the ice rink pays you a rent which can justify you making investments. I have put forward a refrigeration solution which will cost the city nothing and, moreover, is perfectly ecological and will result in substantial electricity savings for the operator. To reopen the ice rink, without mentioning the secondary investments which would only be necessary as part of an improvement of the site, it can perfectly continue to receive the public, schools and sports as it is. An envelope of only €300,000 is sufficient,” writes the former manager before questioning the first councilor.
“How can you resign yourself? »
“Can the city invest €300,000, a sum that would be repaid over the years through rent? Is it certain that there is not a better possible, equitable distribution of the city’s sports/leisure investments which would allow the smile of some to reflect the smile of all those who love sport, by occurrence of skating? Knowing your attachment to the population of Vannes and surrounding areas, to structuring activities for young people, how can you resign yourself to admitting the definitive closure of this establishment? “.
Finally, based on his experience, Olivier Guibert offers his sufficient technical expertise “so that our cooperation results in your satisfaction in maintaining this activity, to the satisfaction of the many people who use this site. It’s not too late. »
What are the financial implications of reopening the Vannes Ice Rink with Mr. Guibert’s proposed eco-friendly refrigeration solution?
Welcome to our latest edition of World Today News Interviews! Today, we are joined by two special guests to discuss the ongoing debate regarding the future of the Vannes Ice Rink. We have Ms. Charlotte Buisson, First Councilor of Vannes’ Sports and Leisure Services, and Mr. Olivier Guibert, former manager of the ice rink and current proponent of its reopening.
Ms. Buisson, thank you for joining us today. Can you tell us more about your decision to close the Vannes Ice Rink and why you believe this is the best course of action for the city?
Ms. Charlotte Buisson: Thank you for inviting me. The decision to close the ice rink was not an easy one, but it was a necessary step after considering all the factors involved. Financially, the ice rink was no longer viable due to high maintenance costs and low attendance rates. We believe that these resources could be better allocated elsewhere in the city to provide more accessible and inclusive sports facilities for everyone.
Mr. Olivier Guibert, you have proposed an eco-friendly refrigeration solution that would cost the city nothing and result in electricity savings for the operator. How does this proposed solution address the financial concerns raised by Ms. Buisson?
Mr. Olivier Guibert: Of course, I understand the financial constraints that the city is facing. However, my solution can effectively reduce the operating costs of the ice rink, making it more sustainable in the long run. The rent paid by the operator would still cover most of the expenses, and any additional investment required for the upkeep of the facility would be minimal compared to the potential revenue generated by reopening it.
Ms. Buisson, you have mentioned the need for a fair distribution of sports and leisure investments throughout the city. Can you explain your reasoning behind this and how you plan to ensure that other sports facilities do not suffer as a result of the ice rink’s closure?
Ms. Charlotte Buisson: Absolutely. We want to make sure that all areas of the city have access to quality sports and leisure facilities. By redirecting resources from the ice rink to other areas, we can improve existing facilities and potentially develop new ones that cater to a wider range of interests and abilities. We want
