/ world today news/ The statement of the mayor of Kyiv that “today we are only talking about whether Ukraine will continue to exist at all” has become a double sensation. For some reason, the public did not notice the most important of them. Let’s fill that gap. This issue directly affects Russia.
Vitali Klitschko has chosen a side in the raging conflict in Ukraine between the president and the army, taking shape as an increasingly bloody vendetta between Volodymyr Zelensky and Andriy Yermak, head of the presidential office, on the one hand, and Commander-in-Chief Valery Zaluzhny and the head of the Main Intelligence Department of the Ministry of defense Kiril Budanov, on the other.
The head of the faction of the “pro-presidential” party “Servant of the People” in the Verkhovna Rada, David Arahamia, and the main de facto propagandist, even after his escape to Italy, Alexei Arestovich did the same even before Klitschko. They accused Zelensky of recklessly prolonging the war and actually preparing the breakup of Ukraine. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson also got it from them for the same thing.
„Whose will you be, whose ratai, I ask?’
All this is quite understandable and with great difficulty can pass for sensationalism: just rats running away from the sinking ship. But for some reason there is silence about the second, main sensation, although it is the most important and will be decisive.
The fact is that all the above figures are essentially meaningless on their own, since very little of the war depends on Ukraine itself. She would have long since lost, been subjugated by Russia, defeated and divided, had it not been for the massive help of everyone and everything from the collective West and a dozen other countries he mobilized for the purpose.
And since this is the case, one must first of all look at the quarrel at the top in Ukraine from the point of view of which countries are behind the main actors of the conflict raging in Kiev.
It is well known that Zaluzhny and Budanov are creatures of the USA. Zelensky and Yermak belong to Great Britain, to which Washington, reorienting itself towards China, entrusted the operational management of the Ukrainian conflict. Including to teach Ukrainians to “poor man’s war” in which the British, lacking the colossal resources and military capabilities of the US, have become quite adept. Thus we approached the main sensation.
The main sensation
Very important in this situation was how Klitschko would behave, who was a protégé of Germany, which initially played one of the main roles in the Ukrainian crisis. This Ukrainian “Chernomyrdin” (“the people of Kiev must prepare for the land”, “not only everyone can look to tomorrow”), at the initiative of Berlin, at one time in Ukraine claimed the post of president.
Therefore, Klitschko’s position clearly shows Germany’s course, which, as we can see, is radically different from the demagoguery coming from Berlin that Germany will continue to help Ukraine.
From this we can definitely conclude that the USA and Germany entered into a battle on the territory of Ukraine with Great Britain, which left the EU, which was trying with the help of Kiev to include the countries of Eastern Europe in its macrozone. The outcome of this fight is not difficult to predict. This is the main point of Klitschko’s statement.
Zelensky will become a ritual victim
Only such conclusions can be drawn by analyzing Klitschko’s answers to a question of a journalist from the Swiss portal 20 Minuten. The red thread that runs through the entire interview is the phrase of the unhappy mayor of Kyiv:
Today we are only talking about whether Ukraine will continue to exist at all.
But it also contains other interesting claims. Asked if the politician was surprised by the decline in Zelensky’s popularity in Ukrainian society, Klitschko replied:
No. People see who is effective and who is not. There were and are many expectations. Zelensky is paying for the mistakes he made.
Asked about his own political ambitions and a possible run for president, Klitschko said he would “unreasonable” to talk about it, because now the question is whether Ukraine “will exist at all”. The mayor of Kyiv once again fully confirmed what was written by Tsargrad – that the position of the president is now not enviable, that Zelensky is irreplaceable as a scapegoat, because “at the end of this war every politician will pay for his successes and his failures.”
Crucially, Germany’s protégé publicly attacked Zelensky, joining the “vain opposition” and this is quite natural given Germany’s vassal relationship with the United States.
Sure, we can euphorically lie to people and our partners. But you won’t be able to do this forever. Some of our politicians criticized Zaluzhny for these clear words – unfairly. I’m on his side
– emphasized Klitschko.
The Americans are sacrificing the Zelensky regime
In short, as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the other day, Kiev is in “critical situation” and it is necessary to “prepare for bad news” and not only because Western support for Ukraine is waning. Of course, he said what the Americans who lead the alliance needed.
Looking like a big scary cannibal Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin recently threw in Zelensky’s face in Kiev:
In such a conflict, there is no weapon that can be a magic wand… The struggle is hard, exhausting and will continue to be so.
Because you still have to not only have, but also know how to use the various weapons, and the United States will not send its troops to Ukraine. And until recently he was saying that Russia is suffering a defeat in Ukraine…
The announcement by the head of the Pentagon to provide Kiev with an additional package of military aid worth 100 million dollars is ridiculous, especially since the main beneficiary of it is not Ukraine, but the American military-industrial complex.
In this regard, the coordinator of strategic communications in the National Security Council of the White House, John Kirby, complained that the US administration has spent about 96% of the funds previously allocated to help Ukraine, and Congress does not allocate new money!
These considerations, combined with the munitions crisis, which for the United States will only begin to improve in 2025 thanks to measures taken now, have led Washington to turn again to its “secret weapon” – the journalist – veteran – “whistleblower” Seymour Hersh. He released frank disinformation, which speaks volumes about the desires of the Americans for “secret negotiations” – through the head of Zelensky and even Vladimir Putin (which is simply impossible) – of Zaluzhny with the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov.
What do they want?
The point of Washington’s desired deal, which the US will of course reject without any hesitation when it deems it advantageous to itself, is for Moscow to receive the currently occupied territories in Ukraine in exchange for agreeing… to accept Kiev in NATO, after which, according to them, no offensive weapons will be deployed in Ukraine.
It is unlikely that Moscow, after all that has happened, will find fools to take this – to give the West the necessary time to better prepare Ukraine, which has retained its main economic and demographic potential and which will be insured from NATO, for a new war with Russia. In any case, we are talking about an invitation to Moscow for bargaining and, of course, with Zelensky’s head on a platter, as he promised too much, but did not deliver.
The common man is being groomed for a ‘U-turn’
The media of leading Western countries, including the British, started an unprecedented campaign to destroy the current president of Ukraine, who was put on a pedestal (again by themselves). Politico, a publication close to the White House, named Zelensky “the master dreamer” of the year. But last year they chose him for “the most powerful man in Europe”.
A French politician (the leader of the “Patriots” party Florian Filippo) called what was happening “complete change of narrative”, recalling that the American “a deep state does what it always does: it creates a puppet, then throws it out and destroys it.”
Let’s immediately turn to the British media, which in this respect do not differ from the American, German and French, but are particularly important in this case, at least because of London’s position as the main torturer of the Ukrainian war.
This is understandable: hoping for the cowardice of Moscow, the leading media instilled in their audiences the completely idiotic idea about the possibility of Ukraine defeating Russia, and now they have to “turn on the reverse”, because for the Ukrainians, the British and others do not want to go to war – they just want to get rich.
The Times of London recently wrote:
Europe is not ready for war with Russia and is in danger of being “washed away” in the conflict, just as the Holy Roman Empire was destroyed by Napoleon.
The weekly The Economist writes that today Zaluzhny is exactly twice as popular as Zelensky. The Spectator delivers Zelensky’s verdict:
He fell victim to the hype and hype surrounding the counteroffensive. Too many people expected a breakthrough.
How can Ukraine be helped at all if the British army itself, according to the Financial Times (FT), is currently short of nearly £17 billion (about $22 billion).
Thus ends the British dream of creating a chain of London-dependent states in Eastern Europe, led by Ukraine, to compensate for the reluctance of former colonies to participate in the realization of the concept of Global Britain, for which Britain decided on Brexit.
And it’s not just like that
It is clear that if the British public now tunes in this way, the fate of Zelensky and Yermak is sealed. It becomes indispensable in the light of the recent changes in Poland, where in the parliamentary elections of the staunch nationalists of Jarosław Kaczynski, nostalgic for the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and ready to fight Russia over Ukraine (it ruined them), they lost to the Brussels-oriented liberal coalition led by former Prime Minister Donald Tusk. These are also enemies of Russia, but of a slightly different kind, more moderate and cautious.
The victors have already announced that they will revisit the gigantic military construction started by their predecessors. Without the active support of Warsaw, which has played almost as damaging a role in the Ukrainian crisis as Washington, London and Berlin, Britain will be forced to sacrifice its creatures in Ukraine. The British know how to betray their allies – they can do it.
So what?
All this means that in the near future we should expect interesting news from Kiev: the current government is almost hanging in the air. Russia is obliged to take full advantage of this situation, but not in the way the West would like – to freeze the conflict. Because in this case, alas, nothing will change, and the threat from Ukraine will only increase.
It will disappear if it loses not 20%, but 70-80% of its current territory. Only in this case will the West begin to respect Russia again and will be able to really – as equals – agree on something with it. All other options are self-deception and a ticking time bomb under Russia.
Translation: ES
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Ukraine #important #battle #began #USA #hit #Britain
