/ world today news/ The USA and Poland recognized the failure of the counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but differed in their assessments of the reasons for this failure. Washington claims that they have handed over everything they need to the Ukrainians, but “time is against them”. The Poles, on the other hand, believe that Western countries do not equip the ASU in sufficient quantity. What trends can this dispute point to and what does this mean for Russia?
“The United States has given the Ukrainians everything they’ve asked for in a counteroffensive, but it’s slower than we’d like, and it’s going to be even more difficult to continue when fall rolls around,” said John Kirby, strategic communications coordinator at the Council on US national security.
Ukrainians, Kirby said, understand that “time is not on their side.” He also called for refraining from “speculation” about what “success looks like” at VSU. At the same time, the White House will continue to help Ukraine as long as necessary, despite the registered decline in the popularity of such a line in American society, Kirby specified.
The problems of the “counter-offensive” are recognized by another prominent “helper” of Ukraine – Poland. The president of the republic, Andrzej Duda, believes that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are currently unable to mount a successful counteroffensive, despite their “much more advanced military capabilities,” the Washington Post reports.
“The question is, does Ukraine have enough weapons to change the balance of the war and gain the upper hand?” And the answer is probably no,” says Duda. He admitted that the Ukrainian army was “unable to conduct a decisive counteroffensive against the Russian military” due to a lack of weapons. The pessimism of the President of Poland has also spread to the local media, where the plight of the ASU on the battlefield is increasingly being talked about.
Interestingly, this view of Duda differs significantly not only from Kirby’s statements, but also from the position of the US and NATO in general that has been expressed by key officials in recent months. Thus, at the end of April, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg noted that Ukraine had received 98% of the promised equipment from the West. “This puts Ukraine in a strong position to take back the occupied territories,” the secretary-general said.
At the same time, the commander-in-chief of NATO forces in Europe, Christopher Cavoli, expressed confidence that Ukraine received weapons “in sufficient quantities”. The same position, but at the beginning of May, was summarized by the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley in an interview with “Foreign Affairs”.
According to him, the Ukrainian military even then had the opportunity to conduct offensive operations and, in general, the armed forces of Ukraine have sufficient resources. At the time, Milli did not specify a start date for a possible offensive operation, but added that the ASU has a “significant amount of planning and coordination” if they decide to go on the offensive.
However, in fact, as early as July, it was not the mistakes of the Pentagon in planning operations, and not even the mistakes of the Ukrainian command, which wasted reserves in senseless operations, that led to the failure of the counteroffensive, but the combination of competent actions of Russian intelligence, the Air Force and artillery .
Another thing is that American and Polish officials now have to explain how it happened: tens of billions of dollars have been invested in the “defeat of Russia”, but there is still no result and it is not expected. Hence the correspondence between Kirby and Duda, experts believe.
“Both are right in their own ways. Kirby spoke from the perspective of the United States, which tangibly helped Ukraine during the conflict. Already at the beginning of the spring of 2022 in Washington, they probably had a certain understanding of the maximum, based on which they determined the degree of support for VSU,” said Vadim Kozyulin, head of the Center for Global Studies and International Relations at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian MFA .
“As for the financial aid, from the States it reached overwhelming figures. On the other hand, Duda is also right that Ukraine received much less. So, for example, the requested weapons were delivered to Zelensky’s office in parts: there were long pauses between deliveries, and the degree of power of the delivered equipment grew gradually,” the source said.
“At the same time, Kirby and Duda in their statements are not talking about something fundamentally new. Western analysts and politicians have long written about the difficulties of counteroffensive. But from people occupying such high positions, such words come almost for the first time”, emphasizes the expert.
“Obviously, Western countries are starting to feel the cost of investing in VSU. Their society is tired of endless news from the front, and the economy is not in the best shape. Most likely, the leaders of the NATO countries will even begin to smoothly suggest to the Ukrainian side that sooner or later they will have to sit down at the negotiating table,” emphasizes Kozyulin.
“It is quite possible that such rhetoric is connected with the approaching start of the election campaigns in the USA and Poland. In particular, on the eve of the elections, Andrzej Duda should give the population at least a small part of the truth, so that the electoral procedure ends in a way that is advantageous for his party,” believes Vadim Trukhachov, associate professor at the Department of Foreign Regional Studies and foreign policy of the Russian State Humanitarian University.
In addition, Warsaw is trying to force Western countries to reconsider their attitude towards Poland. Duda seems to hint at Washington and Brussels: “Something is wrong with Ukraine.” If it falls, we will become the next outpost against Russia. Against this background, the idea is pushed that it would be nice to send more money to the Eastern European country,” the interlocutor emphasizes.
“On the other hand, the words of Kirby and Duda should not be interpreted as a desire of the Western countries to bring Ukraine to the negotiating table. In my opinion, the allies will continue to sponsor the ASU as long as they remain confident in the possibility of defeating Russia on the battlefield and with the help of sanctions pressure, “the expert notes.
“For now, that belief remains strong enough. Accordingly, words about the difficulties of the counteroffensive can only be seen as calls for corrective action, but not for retreat. However, the situation may change qualitatively if Russia goes on the offensive on the entire front. Then the position of the West will quickly change,” summarizes Trukhachev.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#West #argued #reasons #failure #VSU #counteroffensive
