In Assange case, US authorities is responsible: activists

New York and Washington. The information that journalist Julian Assange’s 14-year lengthy odyssey was about to finish together with his launch in trade for his responsible plea below the US Espionage Act was welcomed by human rights advocates and journalists, however virtually all careworn that the actual wrongdoer on this legal case was not the founding father of Wikileakshowever Washington and its allies.

And whereas virtually all main US media reported the information and supplied context on the event of this case, together with that a lot of them used and printed the key official paperwork leaked by Wikileaksnone of them has dared to incorporate a hyperlink to the location to this point Wikileaksand fewer remembered how some deserted him even after they criticized his persecution by the US authorities.

The settlement with the US Division of Justice is for Assange to plead responsible to a felony cost below the US Espionage Act for “conspiring to unlawfully acquire and disseminate categorized info referring to the nationwide protection of the US.”

That crime carries a 62-month jail sentence, however below the deal, his greater than 62 months in a high-security jail in England will rely as a part of his sentence, and he’ll subsequently be launched and return to his dwelling nation of Australia.

However though the Justice Division by no means substantiated its allegations at trial, forcing Assange to plead responsible to only one rely means the federal government will proceed to threaten to make use of the Espionage Act towards any journalist who dares to report on “nationwide safety” issues, together with battle crimes and big human rights violations — criminalizing for the primary time a vital a part of journalistic work, a number of consultants agreed.

Amnesty Worldwide welcomed Assange’s launch from the high-security Belmarsh jail in England, however the organisation’s secretary normal Agnes Callamard careworn that “we firmly consider that Assange ought to by no means have been imprisoned”. She stated: “The spectacle of years of US authorities intent on violating press freedom and freedom of expression by making an instance of Assange for revealing alleged US battle crimes has undoubtedly finished historic injury.”

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) agreed: “It is a prosecution that ought to by no means have been launched. Together with his responsible plea, Julian Assange is now convicted of training journalism, and each investigative journalist now faces heightened authorized jeopardy,” stated Ben Wizner, director of the free speech challenge. He added that revealing authorities secrets and techniques for the general public good is a vital perform of journalism however “at the moment, for the primary time, that exercise was labeled … a legal conspiracy…. Make no mistake, the important work of nationwide safety journalists shall be tougher at the moment than it was yesterday.”

The Committee to Defend Journalists additionally welcomed the information of Assange’s launch, however chair Jodie Ginsburg warned that “the US pursuit of Assange has set a harmful authorized precedent by opening the way in which for journalists to be prosecuted below the Espionage Act in the event that they obtain categorized info.”

David Greene of the Digital Frontier Basis issued a press release charging that “the US has, for the primary time within the 100-plus 12 months historical past of the Espionage Act, secured a conviction below that legislation for primary acts of journalism…. This units a harmful sensible precedent.”

These identical organizations, together with others, despatched a letter to the Biden administration in February 2021, a month after coming to energy, urging it to drop efforts to extradite Assange and insisting that the case posed “a grave menace to press freedom.” However whereas some had hoped that the brand new administration would search to finish the case within the face of such criticism, it was not till very just lately that there have been indicators {that a} solution to conclude this authorized feat was being sought. Biden and his individuals “may have dropped this case three years in the past… each main civil liberties and human rights group repeatedly implored them to take action… however they felt the necessity to emphasize once more that they consider acquiring and publishing secret authorities paperwork is a criminal offense…. The Justice Division wished to convict him below the Espionage Act for acts of journalism,” wrote Trevor Trimm, director of the Freedom of the Press Basis, in a letter to the Biden administration. The Guardian.

The US authorized case towards Assange promoted by the Donald Trump authorities started in 2017 when it declared that Assange’s arrest was “a precedence” and to this finish in 2019 it satisfied a federal grand jury to approve an indictment with 18 prices associated to the leak and dissemination of official US paperwork, together with the well-known recordsdata despatched to Wikileaks by Chelsea Manning, which embody info on severe human rights violations and doable battle crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, in addition to greater than 250,000 diplomatic cables. [

Manning fue enjuiciada durante el gobierno de Barack Obama en una corte militar en 2013 y condenada a 35 años de prisión. Obama conmutó su sentencia en 2017. Y aunque el Departamento de Justicia contempló perseguir a Assange, decidió no proceder ante argumentos de que eso sería criminalizar actividades realizadas por periodistas en los grandes medios. Pero eso no le importó al gobierno de Trump.

Assange enfrentaba una condena máxima de 170 años de prisión. Durante su estancia en Belmarsh desde donde él, sus abogados, su familia y una red de defensores luchaban contra su extradición a Estados Unidos para ser enjuiciado, fue tratado como uno de los reos más peligrosos, mantenido aislado en su celda 23 horas al día

Varios de estos archivos fueron entregados por Wikileaks a algunos de los principales medios del mundo para evaluar y publicarlos. Pero por alguna razón, ninguno de esos medios estadunidenses, al recordar lo que recibieron y cómo trabajaron con Wikileaks, ofrecieron un vínculo, como es costumbre, a Wikileaks, ni recordaron porqué, más allá de criticar al gobierno estadunidense por su persecución legal de Assange, no protegieron a sus fuentes. El sitio de Wikileaks es:

En México, La Jornada fue seleccionada para manejar decenas de miles de cables diplomáticos del Departamento de Estado relacionados con México y la relación bilateral.