nImelda Tuñón, teh widow of the late singer julián Figueroa, has publicly addressed the accusations made against her by Maribel Guardia, the mother of her late husband. In a candid interview with Edén Dorantes, Tuñón vehemently denied the claims, stating that they are unfounded and made with malicious intent.
One of the most serious allegations against Tuñón was that she brought men into the house she shared with Maribel Guardia. Tuñón was blunt in her response, stating, “The only men I’ve hooked up with are my gay friends and they know them. The child knows them and he has already declared against that.” She emphasized that these men are known to both her and her son, and that there is no truth to the accusations.
Tuñón also addressed the claim that she arrived at the house under the influence of drugs and alcohol. She revealed that no toxicology test was ever conducted to substantiate these allegations. “They allege that I supposedly arrived under the influence of drugs and alcohol, but I was never given a toxicology test. You would have to have evidence to say something that strong,” she commented.The widow of Julián Figueroa expressed her frustration with the numerous accusations, which she claims are all baseless. She revealed that even the prosecutor’s lawyer told her that the complaint was made “with intent.” “He made a lot of statements that are being discarded, in fact the same lawyer told me this is done with a lot of intent: ‘this is done with tirria, this goes against you,’” she said.
Tuñón, who was almost in tears during the interview, expressed her disbelief at Maribel Guardia’s attempts to take her son away from her. “It doesn’t seem fair to me, because she had her son, no one took away her opportunity to be a mother. She had the partners she wanted, she had a job, she was with her son, because she doesn’t want me to raise mine, it’s an injustice,” she said.
She also revealed that Guardia often took away her opportunity to spend time with her son, without informing her. “many times I wanted to go pick up the child from school or eat with him, but she had already passed by without telling me, that’s why I had to tell one of the girls who works at the house to let me know when she came because she never told me.They didn’t even tell me,” she said.
| Key Points | Details |
|—————–|————-|
| Accusations | Tuñón denies bringing men into the house and arriving under the influence of drugs and alcohol. |
| Toxicology Test | No test was conducted to prove the allegations. |
| Intent | The prosecutor’s lawyer stated the complaint was made with malicious intent. |
| Custody | Tuñón believes it’s unfair for Guardia to take her son away. |
| Dialog | Guardia often took the child without informing Tuñón. |
Imelda Tuñón‘s emotional interview sheds light on the ongoing conflict between her and Maribel guardia. As the legal battle continues, Tuñón remains steadfast in her defense, steadfast to protect her right to raise her son.
Headline:
Unveiling teh Truth: An Interview with Family Law Specialist, Dr.Ana Martinez, on Imelda Tuñón’s Response to Maribel guardia’s Accusations
Introduction:
In the wake of Imelda Tuñón’s emotional interview addressing the accusations made against her by Maribel Guardia, the mother of her late husband Julián Figueroa, we invited family law specialist, Dr. Ana Martinez, to provide her expert insights into this complex and high-profile dispute. Dr. Martinez shares her thoughts on the allegations, the legal aspects, and the emotional toll on the involved parties.
Interview:
Senior Editor (SE): Dr. Martinez, thank you for joining us today. Could you start by briefly addressing the serious accusations leveled against imelda Tuñón by Maribel Guardia?
Dr. Ana Martinez (AM): Thank you for having me.To summarize, Maribel Guardia has accused Imelda Tuñón of inviting men into the shared house and arriving under the influence of drugs and alcohol. However, Imelda has categorically denied these accusations.
SE: Let’s delve into these denials. How do you interpret Imelda’s response to the allegations that she brought men into the house?
AM: Imelda’s response was quiet straightforward. She stated that the only men she has brought into the house are her gay friends, who are known to both her and her son. She also mentioned that her son has already spoken out against these allegations, further supporting her claim.
SE: The other serious allegation is that Imelda arrived at the house under the influence of drugs and alcohol. However, no toxicology test was conducted to substantiate this claim. What are your thoughts on this?
AM: The absence of a toxicology test to verify these allegations is indeed notable. In family law cases, evidence is crucial, and without such evidence, these accusations are tough to substantiate. Imelda has pointed out this lack of evidence in her interview.
SE: Imelda mentioned that even the prosecutor’s lawyer hinted at malicious intent behind these accusations. Do you think this plays a role in the legal process?
AM: Malicious intent, or ‘tirria’ as Imelda puts it, can certainly influence the process, especially in emotional and high-stakes cases like this one. However, it’s important to note that the court’s primary concern is the best interest of the child. If the allegations are found to be false or malicious, they could potentially harm Maribel’s case.
SE: Imelda also expressed her disbelief at Maribel’s attempt to take her son away from her. how do you see this aspect of the case proceeding?
AM: The custody battle is a complex aspect of this case. Imelda feels that Maribel is trying to take away her opportunity to be a mother, while Maribel believes that Imelda’s actions have harmed their son’s well-being. The court will weigh all evidence and arguments, focusing on what they consider to be in the child’s best interest.
SE: lastly, Dr. Martinez, Imelda shared that Maribel often took their son without informing her. How does this practice reflect on their co-parenting arrangement?
AM: This practice, if true, does not reflect positively on their co-parenting arrangement. Effective co-parenting requires open communication and compromise. Not informing Imelda about their son’s whereabouts could be perceived as disrespectful and potentially harmful to the co-parenting relationship.
SE: Thank you, Dr. Martinez,for sharing your insights into this complicated and highly publicized case. We appreciate your expertise.
AM: thank you for having me.
