:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/metroworldnews/46F4CPZRPRH4TOCURDD6Q6PKD4.jpg?fit=%2C&ssl=1 "“I would even bow at 21″ – Publimetro Chile")
It’s nothing out of the ordinary Marcela Vacarezza expose your opinions through your social networks, and on this occasion you spoke about the minimum age to vote in Chile, which caused a lot of controversy on Twitter.
His words are given in the context of the exit plebiscite of the new Constitution that is being drafted by the Constitutional Convention, and during these days different aspects have been discussed.
“Does the ombudsman for children really propose a vote from the age of 16 for the exit plebiscite?”, commented Vacarezza, alluding to the initiative that proposes that young people aged 16 and 17 can exercise their right in the vote that will define whether the new Constitution is approved or rejected.
“I would even bow at 21. When we are young we think we know them all…the years tell you that it is not like that”, he justified, showing that he does not agree with the proposal.
Does the ombudsman for children really propose a vote from the age of 16 for the exit plebiscite? I would even lean at 21. When we are young we think we know them all… the years tell you that we don’t. I can already imagine the comments to come. Be soft 😉
— Marcela Vacarezza E (@mvacarezza) March 5, 2022
—
A few minutes later, the users of the platform went against the communicator, who already knew that she would receive some words from the public: “I can already imagine the comments to come. Be soft.”
I don’t know about you, but I have spoken with 16 and 17-year-olds who have things clearer than 40-year-olds
— VitokoHerBa 15 de mayo Yawm al-nakba (@Vitokoherba) March 5, 2022
—
