“I know it’s strong, but it’s a bit delicate”… Cho Eun-hee drives away Na Kyung-won

National Power’s Official Youtube Channel’Right Sound’ Capture-On the 19th, the power of the people held the second round of debate for the election of the Mayor of Seoul, and candidate Na Gyeong-won and Cho Eun-hee clashed strongly.

In the discussion that day, Candidate Jo made an onslaught against Candidate Na, saying, “It may be poisonous, but it is not delicate.” I used Candidate Na’s election slogan,’Poisonously Delicate’ in reverse.

Candidate Cho argued that “If you look at candidates’ pledges, such as the breath-taking theory, basic income theory, and child allowance, it costs at least 15 to 17 trillion won (than Seoul’s one-year budget).” Do you know what the annual budget is?”

Candidate Na replied, “Last year, it was 42 trillion won, and 47 trillion won was spent in addition to the additional budget.”

Then Candidate Jo said, “The net budget is 35 trillion won, and a total of 26 trillion won is left after subtracting 9 trillion won going to the Office of Education and autonomous districts.” “The remaining 26 trillion won to 13 trillion won are spent as welfare expenses and the remaining 13 trillion won He pointed out, “Where are you going to get 17 trillion won?”

Candidate Na raised a question, saying, “I don’t know how (Candidate Jo) did the calculations.”

In response, Candidate Jo asked, “I haven’t calculated the overall budget of the pledge?” When the candidate Na answered, “I didn’t calculate the overall budget,” he said, “So it’s not very delicate.”

As the debate intensified, the moderator also intervened. Candidate Na, who showed a disgruntled appearance in the middle of the debate, replied, “It is quite different from the time when Candidate Jo debates with Candidate Se-hoon Oh,” and “It seems to be a one-on-three fight.”

However, Candidate Jo continued to attack, saying, “I should be more delicate,” asking figures such as “Do you know the number of children aged 0-5 in Seoul?”

Candidate Na said, “Candidate Jo who knows numbers very well can do that. Detailed numbers are handled by practitioners,” and Candidate Jo replied, “Ah, I’m a practitioner?”

Candidate Se-hoon Oh and Candidate Shin-Hwan Oh, who had a one-on-one discussion ahead of Candidate Gyeong-won Na and Candidate Eun-hee Cho, debated over’the theory of responsibility for voting for free meals’ and’completeness of commitments’.

When Candidate Shin-Hwan Oh criticized “(10 years ago) he resigned as mayor and is responsible for the current situation,” Oh Se-hoon refuted, “If the wrong welfare begins, the country becomes difficult.” At the same time, Candidate Se-Hoon Oh pointed out that the pledge of Candidate Oh Se-Hwan, the pledge of a half-and-half apartment for young people, was “not realistic.”
–