/ world today news/ It is likely that the Russian leadership has information supported by evidence about who exactly made the decision to physically destroy the gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system in the Baltic Sea and who was entrusted with the physical implementation of this sabotage. As you know, this topic was raised by the President of Russia in the direct line on December 14.
“We didn’t blow up Nord Stream 1 and partly Nord Stream 2.” This was most likely done by the Americans or someone did it on their initiative.
Such silence of the Russian leader on such a sensitive topic of world politics may seem strange to some. People with experience in political preferences will certainly agree that such big trumps are not used casually, as a rule, reserved for a special occasion that most likely will not come tomorrow.
This in no way prevents us from building our own logic of reasoning on this matter and even finding factual confirmations of our assumptions using the methods of the so-called “open source intelligence” (OSINT).
Moreover, as knowledgeable people say, even in state intelligence services up to 90% of useful information is obtained by diligently reading ordinary newspapers and books, studying electronic media and even publicly available pictures from commercial satellites.
It was while searching for such evidence that we turned our attention to an old document generated in the bowels of the Brussels bureaucracy.
In this document, dated April 29, we were alarmed above all by the suspicious foresight of the authors, who motivated some of their decisions by events that had not yet occurred. By the way, the European Parliament:
“…8. Stresses that if such a military build-up in the future turns into an invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, the EU must make clear that the price for such a violation of international law and norms will be heavy; insists that under such conditions Russian oil and gas imports into the EU must be immediately stopped, Russia must be excluded from the SWIFT payment system and all EU assets of oligarchs close to the Russian authorities and their families in the EU must be frozen and their visas are cancelled;
9. Demands that the EU reduce its dependence on Russian energy and therefore calls on the EU institutions and all member states to stop the completion of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and demand an end to the construction of controversial nuclear power plants built by Rosatom …”
We see that at the end of April 2021, the European Parliament already knew for sure that Russia will definitely start what Western propaganda calls “Russian aggression in Ukraine”, and we more adequately call it a special military operation.
A legitimate question immediately arises: how did the enemy have such confidence in its inevitability almost a year before the start of World War II?
The full text of the resolution itself, filled with propaganda gibberish (suffice it to say that the Ukrainian topic is given no more space than the “suffering” of the notorious “Berlin patient”), does not give any guidance in this regard.
The most they managed to wring out was “Russian military maneuvers near Ukraine’s borders”, which are no worse than NATO’s maneuvers near Russia’s borders.
Meanwhile, the leadership of the Russian Federation, in the context of the escalation of the situation in Ukraine by the West, for the first time talked about the possibility of taking “military-technical measures” to protect the vital interests of the country only in the winter of 2021.
Moreover, even then the West was asked to prevent such a development by providing Russia with legally binding security guarantees.
“In this situation, we are taking adequate military-technical measures, but, I repeat, we are not threatening anyone, but they are accusing us of this, given the real state of affairs, i.e. as our people say, from the fullness of the healthy head, which is at least irresponsible” (V. Putin, December 1, 2021)
“…As you know, I suggested to the President of the United States that they begin negotiations to develop specific agreements.
By the way, in fact, during the conversation, he proposed to appoint responsible officials in this area. In response to his proposal, we submitted our drafts that exclude further NATO expansion eastward and the deployment of offensive strike weapon systems in our neighboring countries… We need long-term, legally binding guarantees…
Of course, as I have already noted, if the apparently aggressive line of our Western colleagues continues, we will take adequate counter-military-technical measures and react sharply to unfriendly steps.
And, I want to emphasize, we have the full right to do this, we have the full right to take actions designed to ensure the security and sovereignty of Russia” (V. Putin, December 21, 2021)
Meanwhile, the functionaries of the European Parliament – and this is far from the highest authority in the hierarchy of Western power – even then did not doubt that a large-scale war in Ukraine was inevitable, and in their decisions they based their decisions precisely on this, at that time a purely hypothetical fact.
Moreover, with such a development of events, they demanded the adoption of such radical measures, the implementation of which would deal a heavy blow to the economy of the European Union itself.
First, because it was very heavily dependent on supplies of relatively cheap Russian energy resources.
Second, they were completely unprepared for such shocking changes.
And thirdly, the appeals of the MEPs were formulated in such a way that their literal implementation required radical, both administrative and physical measures.
Some will say – but the decisions of the European Parliament have no binding force, they are nothing more than non-binding “bad wishes”.
To which we will answer: what if the main task of the EP at this stage was precisely the publication of these “bad wishes”? Because the higher-ranking and decision-making Western authorities delegated to him the mission of psychologically preparing public opinion for the inevitable and, moreover, pre-planned consequences.
And since this is precisely the role of the EP, the final expressions used in its resolution (“…imports of oil and gas from Russia to the EU must be stopped immediately…”) and the call “to stop the completion of the of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline take on a completely concrete and extremely sinister meaning.
And one gets the impression that even then the West not only assumed such a development of events, but also clearly knew that everything would be exactly like that. And he knew about it, because he himself had prepared such an exit.
In other words, even a year before the start of the special military operation, all Western military-strategic planning was based on the preparation of such conditions in which the decision of the Russian leadership to use “military-technical measures”, i.e. to begin the special military operation will become inevitable.
It is in fulfillment of these directive goals that the West reduced all negotiations with Russia on mutual security guarantees to an outright profanation. Persistent requests by Moscow to heed its concerns and resume constructive dialogue were simply ignored.
The West sought a proxy war, doing everything to ensure that it could not be avoided. By the way, Zelensky was accordingly pumped at the same time.
It is enough to recall his statement of February 20, 2022 about the nuclear ambitions of Ukraine and the possible withdrawal from the Budapest Memorandum, which became one of the last straws that broke the glass in favor of the decision to start the SVO. Let us recall that the Budapest Memorandum is a document according to which Ukraine joined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Accordingly, in the spring of 2021, decisions were made to physically destroy Russian gas pipelines in the Baltic and to isolate the European economy from Russian energy raw materials as quickly as possible.
And if no special difficulties were foreseen with the acceptance of the relevant documents by the puppet European elite, then the physical destruction of “Northern Streams”, due to the frankly sabotage and terrorist nature of the action, required special conditions and, above all, full awareness of these plans of the leaders of The EU (and especially Germany, which had to suffer the most from this action).
It is impossible even theoretically to imagine that the explosion of the Baltic gas pipelines was organized without the knowledge of the German authorities and Chancellor Olaf Scholz personally. It was impossible to do this otherwise than by securing his full consent.
If he did not agree with the American adventure, the Herr Chancellor would have every opportunity to prevent it. But everything happened exactly the opposite: Scholz simply betrayed his country and sacrificed its national interests to fulfill the plans of the world’s globalist elite.
Let us emphasize once again: the West was preparing in advance and comprehensively a full-scale armed conflict, deliberately driving the situation into a hopeless impasse, doing this not spontaneously, at the last moment, but systematically and gradually.
That is why the European Parliament in the spring of 2021 received instructions to prepare the population under its jurisdiction for extreme decisions.
And the amazing decisiveness with which this body, together with all other “colleagues”, spews extremist suicidal resolutions, imposing decisions detrimental to Europe, is the most direct confirmation of the fact that, in principle, there is no separate European power as a subject of world politics. Those forming such “power” are executors of someone else’s will, hired for money, whose aspirations have nothing to do with the vital interests of the peoples of Europe. And besides, they are diametrically opposed to them.
Translation: SM
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#resolution #European #Parliament #connected #beginning #SVO #explosions
