Home » News » Hotman explains the difference between the Rp 22 billion disappearance case Winda Earl vs the Malinda Dee case

Hotman explains the difference between the Rp 22 billion disappearance case Winda Earl vs the Malinda Dee case

Jakarta

The Rp 22 billion savings case belongs to him Winda Earl that disappeared from the account at Maybank remind the public of the case Malinda Dee. However, Maybank’s lawyer, Hotman Paris Hutapea, considered the two cases to be different.

“Do you still remember the Citibank case which was big (pointing to Hotman’s own chest), M. This is a different case,” said Hotman in a press conference at Jetski Cafe, Pantai Mutiara, Pluit, North Jakarta, Monday (9/11/2020).

The Malinda case had an uproar in 2011. At that time, Malinda broke into customer funds from the bank where she worked. Malinda used tens of billions of rupiah of customer money without the customer’s permission.

“This (Winda Earl’s account case) is not like a normal burglary, with sexy breasts, if it (Malinda Dee) was taken directly at the customer. Such a case would be normal for the bank to pay directly,” said Hotman.

Hotman saw six oddities in the case of the disappearance of Winda Earl’s savings so that Maybank could not suddenly pay for Winda’s missing money. The six oddities are:

1. The Winda Savings and ATM Card held by the Head of the Maybank Cipulir Branch with the initials A.
2. Bank interest A is paid from other banks.
3. The amount of interest is not what it should be.
4. The flow of funds of Rp 6 billion to insurance.
5. Regarding the recognition of a checking account even though there is no checking account.
6. Data on Winda’s savings is filled with the suspect with the initials A.

“But if you saw the oddity that you could see earlier and involved the current accounts, what should the attitude of the bank be? We must first investigate who was involved,” said Hotman.

Unlike the Malinda Dee case, the case in Winda Earl’s savings is suspected by Hotman to be committed by many people. Hotman said there were ‘banks within the bank’ that operated to spin Winda Earl’s money.

“But this is not a plain case, it is clear who the perpetrator is. Outside the branch manager, it looks like someone else. And of course who? You can see. We ask the National Police Headquarters that all people who receive this money should be investigated and made a suspect. . We ask for that. Is it enough? That’s up to the Police Headquarters, “said Hotman.

Watch the video ‘Maybank Reveals a Flow of Funds from the Cipulir District Office to Winda Earl’s father’:

[Gambas:Video 20detik]

Next, take a brief look at Malinda Dee’s case:

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.