/ world today news/ There was no issue of “Working Work” without an introductory article. The introductory article was the voice of the party on the subject treated. It was interpreted “in places”, it was understood as a directive of the top party leadership for relevant actions, these were “words that must be turned into deeds” by the party members and the entire people. There was also a term – “introvert”, a journalist who skillfully writes articles-directives, not subject to doubt, but only to implementation.
The era of democracy came, the templates in journalism were broken, the guiding introductory articles typed with “cher petit” on the front page of newspapers, under the headline, disappeared.
They disappeared, but they seem to be reviving.
I follow talk every day in Trud. In-depth comments, competent opinions of specialists. Often the authors are colleagues and friends with whom we have worked together. As the undisputed specialist in the problems of the Balkans, and in particular of our neighbors from the former Yugoslavia, Kosta Filipov. Or Todor Koruev, who recently wrote a devastating article about the linguistic poverty of our politicians, led by the prime minister, but also of professors and journalists who “me”-kat /go, bleem/, cannot get rid of the dialect reduction like ” Mitoditu” Andreev, or the mass masculinization of the female gender – “teacher”, journalist” instead of teacher, journalist / and this, I beg you, at a time when the titanic battle “for” or “against” the Istanbul Convention for the prevention of any abuse of women/. Or the jewelry article in the same issue by the veteran Vladimir Kostov about the revived kissing scene from the Brezhnev era, which Boyko demonstrates to us every day in his meetings with the mentors from Brussels.
More and more often, however, “introductory articles” appeared in the said newspaper – unsigned, at the top of the first page. My red light automatically lights up: the chairman of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Lozan Panov, will be impeached. His sinister connections with the oligarchic circle “Capital” will be exposed. This “Capital”, perhaps disliked by another oligarchic circle…
But here’s a surprise! In the same issue in which Vlado Kostov’s article was, there was another “introductory” article, of course unsigned, but this time Lozan Panov was spared. To be exalted … the new program director of BNT Emil Koshlukov. Who wants to dispose of one /for now/ of the editors, who can and who should not be invited, how to attract more viewers /maybe by inviting chalgadzhikas instead of serious – imply “boring” figures of culture/, otherwise… Shut up, no one dared to even think that it was about censorship, that was under communism! Against which Koshlukov was probably an active fighter /ABPC/./ Not to be confused with ABPK – an active fighter against fascism and capitalism – note author/
Instead of closing their ears and complying with the orders of the Party and the government, the targeted sinners took it that they went out to protest in front of the BNT building, they were immediately joined by plasterers (probably generously paid) and there was a loud scandal. Which did not please the national TV presenter Koko Kamenarov, who was outraged that this purely “family scandal has become public knowledge”.
So how, the “Labour” ringleader – he is generally anonymous, simply because it is well known that this is the voice of the ruling Party and government, not to give a strong shoulder to their man on television and not to denounce the class enemy!
#introductory #work #View #Info
