Hatayspor Defeats Galatasaray 2-1 in Super League Match: Controversial Referee Decisions Explained

class=”cf”>

G.Saray, which entered the week as the undefeated leader in the Super League, lost 2-1 away to Hatayspor and lost its invincibility title.

Playing its 12th match in the Super League, Galatasaray conceded a goal for the first time against Atakaş Hatayspor in the first half of the match.

HATAYSPOR ENDED THE SERIES

Hatayspor ended the streak of Galatasaray, which had not lost in 17 consecutive matches in the league after the 3-1 defeat to Beşiktaş last season.

HE RETURNS FROM HATAYSPOR AWAY EMPTY-HANDED

Galatasaray cannot get the results it wants on the road against Hatayspor, which is in the Super League for the first time in the 2020-21 season.

The yellow-red team, which has faced its maroon-white rival on the road 3 times in the last 4 seasons (except for the match they won by forfeit 3-0 last season), lost all 3 of them.

Hatayspor, who first beat Cimbom 3-0 in 2020-21, also won the match 4-2 in 2021-22. Aslan, who lost 2-1 yesterday, also lost 4-2 to Hatay in the Turkish Cup in the 2018-19 season.

class=”cf”>

DISPUTED ARBITRATOR DECISIONS

In the match where the Yellow-Reds lost 2-1 to Hatayspor, some of the decisions of the referee Bahattin Şimşek became a matter of discussion.

While Galatasaray objected to a penalty in the positions involving Barış Alper Yılmaz and Mauro Icardi, the host Hatayspor expected a red card for Barış Alper’s intervention against Dele Bashiru.

In the Trio program broadcast by the broadcaster, former referees Bahattin Duran, Bülent Yıldırım and Deniz Çoban evaluated the controversial positions of the match.

IS THERE ANY OFFSIDE ON THE FIRST GOAL?

Is the referee’s decision correct in the goal Hatayspor scored with Rivas in the 13th minute?

Bahattin Duran: There is no offside.

Bulent Yildirim: There is no offside.

Sea Shepherd: There is no offside.

POSITION WHERE BARIŞ ALPER YILMAZ WAITS FOR THE PENALTY

Was the referee’s decision to continue in the 81st minute, where Barış Alper Yılmaz fell down in the penalty area, correct?

Fırat Aydınus: “The football player is looking at the ball while coming. The football player from Hatayspor slips at the last moment. He is avoiding a collision. At that moment, the hand makes contact. This contact is not an intervention that would require a penalty. The decision to continue is correct.”

Sea Shepherd: Is there hand-to-face contact? While falling, the player from Hatayspor slips and loses his balance. As Barış Alper moves towards the ball, the face connects with the hand. This is an accident during a normal fight. Even if it is beyond, there is a very small contact. This happens unintentionally during the fight between the two players. The decision to continue is correct.

class=”cf”>

Bulent Yildirim: Both players are looking at the ball, taking positions to move up. Both players have normal hands and arms. The decision to continue is correct.

Bahattin Duran: If Rivas had made any contact, such as opening his hands and hitting his face, even to take a position, we would have different conversations. The Hatayspor player’s focus is entirely on the ball, when he presses the ground with both feet at the same time, his foot slips and there is an involuntary contact. There will be contact in football. It is not a violation that would warrant a penalty.

class=”cf”>

“UNDISPUTED RED CARD”

The position between Barış Alper Yılmaz and Dele Bashiru in the 88th minute…

Sea Shepherd: “Red card by Barış Alper.”

class=”cf”>

Bulent Yildirim: “An undisputed red card to Barış Alper.”

Bahattin Duran: “Peace’s movement is red”

“A CLEAR PENALTY”

90+7. Could a penalty have been awarded for the position where Mauro Icardi was down in the minute?

Bulent Yildirim: This is a clear television penalty. Let me tell you shortly. Why? It’s not a bash in carom. Whose foot lands where, accidental stepping in the carom is not a matter of contact. Even though the player knows where his opponent is, he takes the risk and pretends to rise towards the ball and opens his feet. He’s making a careless move. Many penalties were given and goals were canceled in similar positions. He spreads his feet too much while trying to take place. He prevents his opponent from stepping on his feet and rising. It’s not a yellow card, but this position is a penalty.

Sea Shepherd: Last season, in the Antalyaspor match, Galatasaray’s goal was canceled during the attack phase because Icardi stepped on his opponent’s foot. The player from Hatayspor opens his feet more than naturally. Icardi will rise to the ball. The effect is there, 100 percent. He can’t jump. Undisputed penalty. No carom. Hatayspor player opens his feet deliberately. A clear violation. It is also easy to show, explain and prove.

class=”cf”>

Bahattin Duran: The most important issue is that the player from Hatayspor puts his foot down, takes risks and acts carelessly. The opened foot steps on Icardi’s foot. A clear violation. Stepping on foot and clear penalty. I’m thinking about the VAR side. When this ball comes to Icardi, it looks like Icardi won’t be able to hit it no matter how high he rises. I wonder why VAR didn’t intervene? I think it’s a clear penalty.

2023-11-12 05:22:55
#Referee #decisions #Hatayspor #Galatasaray #match #created #controversy #clear #penalty #red #card.. #Football #News #Football #News