Hasty judicial reform implies “main issues”: Norma Piña

Mexico Metropolis. Finishing up a reform to the Judiciary in a hasty method entails the danger of “giving rise to larger issues” than these which might be meant to be resolved, so the modifications should be made with the victims and the customers of the justice system in thoughts, and never prioritizing velocity, warned the chief justice of the Supreme Court docket of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Norma Lucía Piña Hernández.

Talking on the boards on the reform of the Judicial Department, which started right this moment within the Chamber of Deputies, the decide confused that this train “represents a singular alternative to replicate and debate on problems with nationwide significance that contain all of the powers of the Union.”

On this framework, he highlighted that the Judicial Department of the Federation has held listening tables in all areas of the nation, by which judicial authorities, police, prosecutors, public defenders, consultants, legislators, college students, looking out moms and victims have participated. by which qualitative and quantitative data was collected on the nation’s precedence issues.

“It’s important to say it very clearly: justice in Mexico just isn’t a monopoly of the Judiciary,” so a reform on this occasion “implies, at a minimal, reflecting on the position it performs as a cornerstone for sustaining peace and cohesion, and resolve in an neutral and unbiased method the conflicts that come up in a democratic society.”

Because of this, Piña referred to as to be essential of justice in Mexico, however placing the wants of the victims and customers of the justice system usually on the middle. “Allow us to criticize based mostly on the reality, on true knowledge, on appropriate figures, valued of their context. Allow us to criticize with honesty and State duty.”

After requesting that on this dialogue train the thought of ​​a call made be “diluted,” the president of the SCJN confused: “the fast tempo of structural modifications can solely result in greater issues. (…) In judicial reform, velocity mustn’t weigh greater than suitability; Victims and people who go to the justice system deserve trustworthy, service-minded, empathetic and educated judges.”