Hack “Sonthiya”, a nagging political thing Mano cried and stared at the collapse of Pheu Thai. Beware that making false claims is severely punishable. Beware of criminal return
Date 28 Dec. ’22 Mr. Chumsai Sriyapai The Deputy Secretary General of Pheu Thai Party (Public Organization) stated the case Mr. Sonthiya Sawasdee Submit a petition to the Electoral Commission of Thailand (ECT) demanding the dissolution of the PT party the reason Mrs. Paethongtarn Shinawatra The householder Pheu Thai travels to meet Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra Former father of prime minister in Hong Kong claiming that it was an offense under Article Political Parties Act Section 44,45,28,29 has a penalty under Section 92(3)(4) for not having seen Mr. Sonthiya’s petition. But if you look at the issue from the media, it’s unsubstantiated to be a crime as claimed. no unnecessary facts. There was no evidence and circumstances. to point out that it is wrong
but rather using the imagination to find reasons to illegally table the dissolution of the party you believe The election commission would not agree. The PT Party is not at all shaken by this story. because the party carries out political activity according to the provisions of the constitution all the regulations and laws and has not committed the alleged crime. Mr. Sonthiya shouldn’t act as a political nuisance.
Mr. Chumsai continued to repeat Mr. Sonthiya’s actions should be considered as an accusation against any political party or person for committing an offense under Article Acting on Political Parties Election Commission, knowing it is a lie Imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, a fine not exceeding 100,000 baht, or both. and order the court to revoke the right to stand for election
If there are further facts and evidence of the involvement of a political party, they will be punished double. Section 101 of the Political Parties Act, which the Electoral Commission shall deal with according to its powers and duties in the matter. The Election Commission to investigate Mr. Sonthiya’s actions on December 29 at 10:00 at the Election Commission office.
Mister Chum Sai She said A trip to meet Mr. Thaksin, Ms. Pae Thongtarn’s father. It is not an offense. It is common for mortals to meet and visit family members. Mr. Thaksin did not dominate and was not guilty under sections 28 and 29 as claimed by Mr. Sonthiya. so he didn’t understand why Mr. Sonthiya was crying Election Commission about it Even if Mr. Sonthiya or his opponent tried to attack Ms. Pae Thongtarn or the PT Party He could not destroy the faith that people’s brothers and sisters had in the PT Party , including the popularity that the brothers of the people had in Ms. Phae Thong Than The most slanderous attackers The more popularity points will be added to the party. because there are people who deliberately slander the policy even though the party has not taken action
“Mr Sonthiya’s complaint was not sure if it was a defamatory attack. Is there a hidden political agenda? Because Mr Sonthiya is close and intimate with Mr. Seksakon Atthawong Former Deputy Prime Minister or Rambo, wholeheartedly commending Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, the Prime Minister. If Mr. Sonthiya wants to work in politics he should aim for the benefit of the people. It’s better than spending time on complaints like this. Be careful. This action will result in criminal penalties for the complainant,” Chumsai said.
