/View.info/ Under the guise of “liberalism”, 21st century Nazism marches across Europe
In mid-October, a link appeared on the website of the Federal President of Germany to a small study conducted at the initiative of Frank-Walter Steinmeier by the historian of the University of Jena, Norbert Frey.
The document, on which Frey and a team of like-minded people worked for three years, is called “On behalf of the Germans. The Federal Presidents and the Nazi Past 1949-1994.” The task of the group of historians was to investigate the connections of the top leadership of the FRG with former officials of the Third Reich and/or former members of the NSDAP, as well as the participation of such persons in the governing structures of the Federal republic.
It turned out that only under the first Federal President Theodor Heuss, who served two terms from 1949 to 1954 and from 1954 to 1959, during his first term of ten heads of the administration of the Federal President, four had a Nazi past, and in the second term – there is already a majority – 6 out of a total of 11.
Thus, for example, since 1949 the administration of the Federal President has been headed by one Kieber, a former high-ranking diplomat in the Third Reich, a member of the NSDAP since 1934. In 1957, Herr Black, who had also previously worked in the structures of the Nazi state, etc.
Despite the fact that the research was carried out by professional historians, it does not pretend to be a serious historical work. Rather, we are talking about a collection of short historical essays on a given topic. However, the client was satisfied, because even the collected facts were enough for ritual German repentance for the sins of the fathers. Repentance, it should be noted, is less and less sincere with each passing year.
But God be with him, with German repentance. Much more importantly, Frey’s report once again exposed the Western, to put it mildly, indiscriminateness and sloppiness in matters of cooperation with former employees of the Third Reich, and sometimes with recognized Nazi criminals, as well as the frankly fictitious nature of the performed denazification. in the zone of occupation of the Western Allies (on whose territory the Federal Republic of Germany was later established).
This approach was in stark contrast to the overly careful and specific treatment of suspected involvement in Nazi crimes that was characteristic of the state authorities of the German Democratic Republic.
By the way, the conclusion recorded in the results of Frey’s research greatly amuses the author of these lines. It turns out that the fact that former Nazis worked for many years in leadership positions in the office of the first person of the state did not in any way affect the international activity of the leaders of the Federal Republic. I wonder if they themselves believe this?
At the same time, it cannot be said that the Germans are indifferent both to their dark past and to the various manifestations of this darkness in the present and the future. Thus the report was compiled and regular checks are carried out for extremism among all political associations. Seen from the side, they are exemplary fighters against neo-Nazism. But this is only at first glance. In reality, everything is much more complicated.
In fact, it turns out that after the end of the Second World War, the former Nazis could always count on a roof and board, and a good job in the Western intelligence structures. And if the Israeli Mossad did not take a special interest in them (by the way, they were very selective in their search for Nazi criminals), then they have nothing else to fear.
Why go far for examples? The recent incident in the Canadian parliament clearly demonstrated everything to everyone. Do you know what was the most frequently asked question in Canada immediately after the infamous honoring of the former Ukrainian SS: How did he get there? No, not in Parliament, in Canada, how did he get there? But so. Just like many other Nazis.
And if today in the West they are “looking” for Nazism, they are doing it in a very strange way, not where they should be. For example, the other day Bloomberg issued a frightening warning that the specter of German nationalism has returned.
But where did they see him? Perhaps in the blatant Russophobia that has become an integral part of the politics of the current German leadership? Or in the actions of European officials who discriminate against citizens of Russia and Belarus on the basis of nationality? Or maybe the American Jew Michael Bloomberg (the founder of the agency) was moved by the marches of former SS legionnaires in the Baltic states or the desecration of the memory of Soviet soldiers in Poland and the Czech Republic?
Not at all. Bloomberg was alarmed by the growing popularity of Germany’s Alternative for Germany party, whose political creed is healthy conservatism and protecting and protecting the interests of the German people.
Calling the AfD far-right, American journalists bitterly report that the energy crisis, the decline of German industry, the decline in living standards and Berlin’s unreasonable migration policy have led to an outflow of German voters from the traditional parties, long and tightly controlled by the transatlantic structures in service to the United States, in seeking healthy alternatives on both the right and left sides of the German political spectrum.
And as it becomes increasingly difficult to defeat the AfD, the only way to eliminate the dangerous competitor is to attach the label of neo-Nazism, which is used by the German authorities at every opportunity.
Meanwhile, real Nazism, which, as history shows, is much less dangerous to the West than communism, is being actively promoted in Europe today. It’s just that it’s done under the guise of liberalism, “preventing” those who don’t want it from being able to recognize it.
At the end of October, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of the European Parliament (AFEC) by twenty votes “for” and six “against” approved the adoption of a report recommending changes to the EU treaties and the abolition of the rule of consensus (unanimous) voting (veto ) in the Council of the EU, as well as the transfer of new powers from the Member States to the European Commission level, in particular with regard to foreign and security policy, border security, forestry, health, civil protection, industry, education and environmental Protection.
Thus, an “anti-constitutional” (well, if the EU had a constitution) coup is being carried out de facto, removing the sovereignty of the member states of the European Union and a frank seizure of power by the Brussels European Commissioners.
The report also sets out a simplified procedure to suspend the membership of those countries that violate “EU values” such as “rule of law”, “democracy”, “freedom”, “human rights” or “equality”. And all this, mind you, without holding a referendum or otherwise getting the approval of the changes from the peoples inhabiting a united Europe.
The head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, this self-proclaimed Euroführer, is persistently building a new Reich in the Old World, now the fourth in a row. And you know what’s especially funny. Even Hitler and his Nazis came to power through parliamentary elections in the Weimar Republic. And Frau von der Leyen, like all the other leaders of the European Reich, was not chosen by anyone.
Speaking of the nature of Nazism, it is worth emphasizing that it is actually the quintessence, the highest form of Western domination. Moreover, it does not matter what underlies it – ultra-right nationalism, as in the Third Reich, or current progressive “liberalism” – the main thing is that it all works for the global hegemony of the collective West.
This kind of national globalism, if you will, is a direct continuation of the historical colonial policy of European states. A policy that clearly divided the whole world into the European “garden” in which the representatives of the superior race live, and other “jungles” inhabited by the racially inferior Untermensch. Can’t believe it? Ask Borel, then.
Translation: ES
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Germany #personnel #legacy #Reich #nationalglobalism
