The German Defense Minister Boris Pistoriusstated this Monday that the decision of Washington to authorize Ukraine the use of long-range missiles supplied by USA to attack military objectives in Russian territory will help the invaded country, while confirming the delivery to kyiv of 4,000 German drones controlled by artificial intelligence.
«From what I have heard, the Americans now allow the Ukrainians to use ATACAMS with a range of 300 kilometers also to target the interior of Russia. It is a decision that is not for me to judge, but it will undoubtedly help the Ukrainians. For us it does not mean a change in the situation.”said.
Asked if he predicts an increase in Ukraine’s pressure to receive long-range cruise missiles Taurus From Germany, Pistorius said, within the framework of a visit to the MBDA arms consortium in southern Germany, that he could not respond to that and reiterated, upon insistence, that “there will not” be a change in position.
On the other hand, Pistorius confirmed that Germany will begin step by step with the delivery to Ukraine of 4,000 German-made attack drones controlled by artificial intelligence, which will represent for the Ukrainian armed forces “one more really important asset, especially when it comes to attacking logistics chains and command posts in the interior.
He specifies that these drones – nicknamed Mini-Taurus – can go within 30 to 40 kilometers, attack command posts, logistics nodes and others and, in particular, “have the ability to undermine the enemy’s electronic defenses to, so to speak, reach still the objective.
For his part, in an ordinary press conference, the deputy spokesperson of the German Government, Wolfgang Büchnerreiterated the German Chancellor’s refusal, Olaf Scholzto supply Taurus to Ukraine by pointing out that “the chancellor has set certain limits that he does not want to cross and has clearly determined and said that this position is not going to change, that they are not going to deliver this long-range weapon.”
He added that Scholz has always stressed, time and again, that “for him it is important to organize support, especially military support, in such a way that it does not lead to an escalation of this war.”
Regarding the American decision, Büchner refused to comment and pointed out that in the past the German Government has not commented on the individual decisions of each of the States that support Ukraine.
Meanwhile, the German Foreign Minister, Annalena Baerbockdescribed the American decision as “important” at this time, which he said does not represent a change of course, but rather an “intensification” along the lines of the support already provided to kyiv.
He stated that it is “essential that the protection of peace and the protection of Ukraine does not begin only on Ukraine and added that “the right to self-defense means that we do not have to wait for a rocket to hit a children’s hospital or a school or a a normal block of flats.
On the contrary, within the framework of international law it is possible to hit the launching points of these projectiles in enemy territory and any other country in the world would do precisely that, he argued. EFE (I)
#Germany #confirms #delivery #drones #Ukraine
**How might Germany’s refusal to provide Taurus missiles, while supplying AI-controlled drones, impact the effectiveness of Ukrainian defence strategies against Russian forces?**
## World Today News Interview: German Drone Delivery and US Missile Authorization
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today, we’re diving deep into the latest developments regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. We have two esteemed guests with unique perspectives on this issue:
* **Dr. Anya Petrova:** A political scientist specializing in European security and arms control.
* **Colonel David Mitchell (Ret.):** A former US military strategist with extensive experience in international relations and conflict analysis.
**Section 1: The Impact of US Decision on Missile Use:**
* **Interviewer:** Dr. Petrova, the US has authorized Ukraine to use long-range ATACAMS missiles to target Russian territory. What are the potential strategic implications of this decision? How might this shift the dynamics of the conflict?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
* **Interviewer:** Colonel Mitchell, from a military perspective, how significant is this decision? Could this escalate the conflict further, as some have argued? What are the potential risks and benefits for both Russia and Ukraine?
**Section 2: Germany’s Drone Delivery and Stance on Taurus Missiles:**
* **Interviewer:** Germany has confirmed the delivery of 4,000 AI-controlled drones to Ukraine. While this offers a new tool for the Ukrainian army, Germany still refuses to provide Taurus cruise missiles. Colonel Mitchell, can you shed light on the reasoning behind Germany’s divergence in supplying weapon systems?
* **Colonel Mitchell:**
* **Interviewer:** Dr. Petrova, what implications could Germany’s cautious approach have on its role as a key ally in supporting Ukraine?
**Section 3: Balancing Support for Ukraine with Escalation Concerns:**
* **Interviewer:** Germany emphasizes the need to avoid escalation. Dr. Petrova, do you believe there is a clear line between providing necessary military support and risking a broader conflict? What are the ethical considerations involved?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
* **Interviewer:** Colonel Mitchell, do you agree that avoiding direct confrontation while supporting Ukraine is a precarious balancing act? How can countries like Germany and the US effectively walk this tightrope?
**Section 4: Looking Ahead:**
* **Interviewer:** Looking forward, what are the potential long-term consequences of these decisions, both on the conflict itself and on the broader geopolitical landscape? Dr. Petrova, what scenarios do you foresee based on current developments?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
* **Interviewer:** Colonel Mitchell, do you see any potential avenues for de-escalation or a negotiated settlement in the foreseeable future?
**Closing:**
Thank you, Dr. Petrova and Colonel Mitchell, for sharing your expertise and insightful perspectives with us today. This is a complex and evolving situation, and the decisions made by various nations will undoubtedly continue to shape the course of events. We encourage our viewers to stay informed and engage in constructive dialog on these critical issues.
