Genoveva Casanova has disappeared once more. It was final March when the Mexican reappeared after months away from the media highlight, all attributable to some photographs of her strolling by the streets of Madrid with the then Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark. Some pictures that managed to place the oldest monarchy in Europe in verify, however that additionally triggered a scenario of unthinkable media strain for the ex-wife of Cayetano Martínez de Irujo.
The Mexican has tried to stay in a discreet background since then, particularly for the reason that coronation of Frederick X after the abdication of her mom, Queen Margaret II; and the persevering with rumors of disaster within the marriage of the brand new king and his spouse, Mary Donaldson. For that reason, seeing an essential date approaching for the Danish king would have triggered Genevieve to place her foot down as soon as once more.
GTRES
It’s unknown the place Genoveva Casanova is situated. The Mexican has additionally deleted her Instagram account, making her whereabouts much more mysterious.
The date that the Mexican apparently wished to keep away from would have been the birthday of the monarch, who celebrated his 56th anniversary final Sunday, Might 26. A day that, predictably, was going to be stuffed with headlines within the press that reviewed the life and work of one of the crucial controversial and media-friendly royals of latest instances.
Inside that journey, as was not going to be much less, the rumors with Genoveva Casanova had been going to be included. That is what occurred within the newspaper Elkstra Bladet, the place the statements of Jesper Olsen, president of Transparency Worldwide of Denmark, who harshly criticized the brand new king for his “fixed errors and faults” had been reported.
EFE
“What occurred along with his images with Genoveva Casanova is a mirrored image of the opacity of King Frederick,” Olsen begins by saying, revealing his discontent with the “additional” bills of the brand new monarch, each in journey and safety – which he later didn’t use. , additionally placing his individual at risk-; along with what he imagined to his nation.
“About his journey to Madrid, in addition to different transfers that he has made with out giving discover, nothing was identified, nor was it identified how a lot they value,” he continued, including that “if the members of royalty have the opportunity of utilizing the assets of the embassies, then it must also be public what number of instances they use them. “It’s important to be politically conscious of what it prices to have a Royal Home.”
The Danish royal home speaks out in favor of Frederick X and his “personal” life
Confronted with these assaults by Olsen within the native press, the Danish royal home didn’t hesitate to talk out in favor of its king, merely commenting that his personal life is the king’s enterprise, though “it’s all the time fastidiously thought-about which implies of transportation is probably the most applicable to make use of”, considering “the logistical circumstances and environmental influence”.
Martin Sylvest / EFE
Even so, he’s not the one one dissatisfied with the reign of Frederick X, who has served as sovereign of the Danes since his mom’s abdication on January 14. The controversies don’t cease rising, particularly in relation to his escapades and his marriage, which isn’t going by the most effective of instances.