3DMarks have their traditional specifications, but the first game test results (from Nvidia) have already been published, and independent results from synthetic tests will complement them appropriately.
graph-1
The first graph contains Time Spy DirectX 12 scores at 1440p.
graph-2
Second score in the same but in 4k resolution.
graph-3
The last one is Speed Way DirectX 12 in 1440p.
| Time Spy DX12 1440p |
Time Spy Extreme DX12 4K |
Speed Way DX12 1440p |
diameter | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (vs. 3060 Ti) |
+14,3 % | +9,9 % | +7,7 % | +10,6 % |
| Radeon RX 7600 (vs. 6600) |
+31,1 % | +36,8 % | +39,1 % | +35,7 % |
| Radeon RX 7600 (vs. 6650 XT) |
+6,8 % | +11,3 % | +16,5 % | +11,5 % |
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti achieves an average of 10.6% higher performance than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in these three tests. That’s pretty close to the 13% difference in gaming performance that Nvidia’s graphics presented (without DLSS 3.0 frame-generation).
The Radeon RX 7600, on the other hand, delivers 35.7% more performance over the Radeon RX 6600, which is quite nice. The intergenerational shift is 3x higher than between the aforementioned GeForce models. Even the difference between the Radeon RX 7600 and the Radeon RX 6650 XT is slightly higher at 11.5% than the GeForce’s 10.6%. Thus, while Nvidia brought 10.6% more performance at the same price level ($399) in more than two years, AMD brings 35.7% more performance at the same (or lower) price level over the intergenerational period.
2023-05-21 22:05:48
#Radeon #GeForce #RTX #3DMark #Performance #gains #expected
