Galatasaray vs Ankaragücü: Former Referees Evaluate Controversial Calls

Galatasaray won 3-0 away from Ankaragücü. Former referees evaluated the controversial positions in the fight on the broadcaster.

Comments of former referees are as follows:

Look at

– There was a move towards Kerem Aktürkoğlu in the 1st minute. Should a foul decision have been made?

Sea Shepherd: Referee Ali Şansalan caused objections by blowing or not blowing whistles. A foul should have been called. Clear yellow card.

Bulent Yildirim: Radakovic is completely targeting Kerem. He took out his knee and made Kerem fall. The referee did not make an advantage signal. A yellow card should have been added to the foul. Kerem’s foot comes to Radakovic’s foot, but it is Radakovic who takes out his knee and blocks the running path.

Bahattin Duran: This is a tactical foul. Now it’s a goal position. There should have been a yellow card along with the foul.

“THERE CAN’T BE A PENALTY LIKE THIS”

– Did Mujakic play with his hand in the penalty area in the 6th minute?

Bulent Yildirim: When he saw the ball, he tried to avoid it. The ball hit the outside of his body. He grazes the arm. No penalty required.

Sea Shepherd: Penalty is an example of how not to do it.

Bahattin Duran: Mujakic closed his arm as much as possible and did not move out of the natural position. This is a regular intervention.

– Is a penalty required in the position where Mertens fell down in the 9th minute?

Sea Shepherd: Mertens collapsed instead of attacking the ball. The defender actually used his hands, but this is not a move that will disrupt Mertens. Mertens tries to take a penalty by leaning on the opponent. It’s not cheating or it’s a penalty, it’s not that either.

Bulent Yildirim: A double challenge. Mertens tried his luck. After controlling the ball, he braked it while he had a chance to go to the ball and fell to the ground due to the intervention of his opponent. This intervention is within limits. Mertens tried to take advantage. There is no such penalty.

Bahattin Duran: There is a touch on Mertens, but it does not make an impact. Mertens, who receives the contact, quickly throws himself to the ground. The decision to continue is correct.

“THE REFEREE MADE A MISTAKE HERE”

– Is the referee correct in the penalty awarded in favor of Galatasaray in the 37th minute? Is there a foul at the beginning of the attack?

Bulent Yildirim: Mertens interferes with the Ankaragücü player. The ball came to the Ankaragücü player. The referee did not choose to call a foul. This position is a foul. Mertens went without paying attention to the ball, hit his opponent and dropped it. The referee continued because the ball was passed to the Ankaragücü player. This is a mistake as the referee did not make the advantage signal. The player from Ankaragüç made a knowing, intentional and controlled pass when there was no one around him. That phase ended because he made the wrong pass. A new attack phase has begun. Kazımcan slipped uncontrollably and intervened, and the referee correctly awarded a penalty. Mertens fouled an Ankaragücü player. If the penalty had been in phase, VAR would have intervened. The problem on the field is this; This position is a penalty. Mertens has a foul before the penalty. I don’t know why the referee didn’t call, he chose not to. VAR could not intervene because it was not in the attack phase. There is no problem with the penalty.

Sea Shepherd: There is a clear foul. Mertens made the foul. If there was a foul, Ankaragücü would take a free kick close to the goal. If this ball goes forward and an Ankaragücü player receives it, I can say that the referee played the advantage. Team benefit is important in advantage. The ball goes back. Even if the referee is giving advantage here, he has made a mistake. He shouldn’t have played advantage in this position. Even if he is trying to gain an advantage, he should show it with body language. The referee doesn’t have that kind of body language at all. This is not at the referee’s discretion. If it is included in the game rule book, this referee has to show it. I need to know whether the referee saw this or not. Ali Şansalan did not play an advantage here. If only he had played an advantage and showed it. There is a foul here. There is a clear penalty following. TRUE. However, there is a foul before the penalty, although it is not where VAR intervenes.

Bahattin Duran: Mertens commits a foul. Let’s not read the intention. If he is playing for an advantage, he should express this with one hand or two hands. The position is clearly a foul. No card required. The referee did not consider it a foul. He did not consider advantage. The referee continues. There is no doubt about the penalty. The movement made by Mertens at the beginning of the position is a foul.

“THE GOAL DECISION WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER”

– Is the yellow card Köhn received in the 59th minute correct?

Bulent Yildirim: Correct, clear. The referee’s angle is perfect. The foot thrown by Köhn came to Morutan. A yellow card is enough.

Sea Shepherd: Yellow card is correct.

Bahattin Duran: Yellow card is clear.

– Is the foul decision correct in Galatasaray’s canceled goal in the 66th minute?

Sea Shepherd: Ali Şansalan kept the whistle waiting. After scoring, he decided to foul. Why? So that VAR can step in if there is a problem. It would have been much more correct if the goal had been decided. The player from Ankaragüç threw himself on Köhn to get a foul and fell to the ground. No foul. Let’s assume that there is a foul, the goal cancellation is correct… The reaction of the Ankaragüç player to the referee without waiting for the referee’s decision should have been a yellow card.

Bulent Yildirim: When Kitsiou was close to the ball, Köhn turned it with his hand, which he did not extend but placed on his waist. Köhn prevented Kitsiou from intercepting the ball. Kitsiou’s protest was not tolerable, he should have received a yellow card. Kitsiou dominated the ball, Köhn stayed behind, grabbed him by the waist, turned, turned and passed, gaining an unfair advantage. The referee interpreted it correctly, it is a foul.

Bahattin Duran: Kitsiou was closer to the ball, giving his body, and put it in front of the Galatasaray player. Köhn has his hand on Kitsiou’s waist. I don’t think it’s very effective. The referee saw this and called a foul. Is a penalty awarded for this intervention? I will never accept it. I can understand the referee, but the better decision for me would have been no foul.

2024-02-18 20:52:40
#referees #evaluated #Ankaragücü #Galatasaray #match #penalty #decision #correct