“Lebanon Debate”
The appearance of former Prime Minister Saad Hariri on the Al-Hadath channel affiliated with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and his decisive words about Hezbollah’s responsibility for the assassination of his father, had an indication in which some saw that we are facing a different political scene for the Blue Movement, and that the relationship with Hezbollah is not good, and it is trying to appease the Kingdom.
This is an opinion that journalist writer and analyst Ghassan Rifi disagrees with, and explains that “what Prime Minister Hariri said was that the court was the one who convicted these people and gave the killer good news of death, even after a while. Therefore, he believes that there is nothing new in Prime Minister Hariri’s words, as this is the language he has adopted regarding the assassination.” His father has not changed.”
He confirms that this is a permanent “cliché” regarding the court, from which Prime Minister Hariri cannot leave, and contrary to what they are trying to interpret from these words, he saw great appeasement from him, as he spoke on the issue of Gaza with a lot of support and support for Gaza, and he did not come to the southern front and did not speak with the logic of the forces. The opposition says that Hezbollah is implicating Lebanon in the support process, as said by the head of the Phalange Party, Sami Gemayel, or the head of the Lebanese Forces Party, Samir Geagea.
He believes that “the relationship with the party at this stage is good, especially since he said in his speech that there is a link between a dispute between the Future Movement and Hezbollah. As for the issue of the court and the accusation of elements of Hezbollah, for Prime Minister Hariri, it is something that he cannot get out of, and it is a language he has adopted for a long time.” He also said that they are dying in Syria, and he did not say that we want to take revenge on them or confront them.”
He believes that “the language was diluted, and what he said regarding the party and the court cannot be based on it in politics, especially since this matter has become a thing of the past and the accused no longer exist.”
Rifi asserts, “What can be built upon is the talk about Lebanon and Gaza. He was in solidarity with Gaza, rejecting the aggression against Lebanon and Gaza, and therefore he did not criticize the participation of the resistance by supporting Gaza from the southern front. This matter upon which one can build is that Prime Minister Hariri is in a conflict-related relationship with Hezbollah.” “.
2024-02-15 12:57:09
#words #Hezbollah.. #Hariri #performing #duties #obedience
